View Single Post
Old 10-03-2012, 02:05 PM   #14
Maine04657
V.I.P. Member
 
Maine04657's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 329
Default Re: considering a suppressor

Quote:
Originally Posted by soundguy View Post
You must have been refering to your own post


You might want to do a lil research, and then come back and edit your post!,

this might give you more info.

i specifically said registered BBL nut ...

http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/showthread.php?t=107975

so NO.. it's NOT a bad legal idea.. It's a LEGAL idea that costs you the 200$ tax stamp and a form 4.

all it takes is a lil research.......
I know EXACTLY what you where talking about. IT IS A BAD IDEA. As per BATF regs suppressor parts ARE NOT legal for user to replace. This means that BY law if you change the filter on this your have committed a felony. This is why the majority of dealers will not touch this. So yes it is a VERY bad legal idea. The "Econo-Can" can has a ATF letter BUT HAS NOT BEEN TESTED. This means if you buy one it is likely you will not be keeping it.
Maine04657 is offline   Reply With Quote