View Single Post
Old 10-01-2008, 12:09 PM   #16
delta13soultaker
Advanced Senior Member
 
delta13soultaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Depends on Uncle Sam's whim every 3 yrs.
Posts: 2,948
Default Re: .22 rifle vs. .38 handgun

I understand now what you're saying better. Yeah it is interesting how close the energy seems.

Velocity is a useful number to a guy. He can use that along with bullet weight to closely guess a given trajectory. Add in the ballistic coefficient etc etc and he can guess really damn close. I say "guess" because air temperature, humidity and mother nature have the right to change their minds at any moment and play games with velocity (i.e. trajectory/your close and far zero).

But energy in ft-lbs? It is a general guess at what a bullet might do.

People who make and sell ammuntion love ft-lbs. It makes a bar to measure against that shooters (customers) can see. It's just like in casinos....games where a percentage of wins vs losses is displayed gets more players. But that percentage from past plays has zero effect on the next plays. None. Looking at ft-lbs is kind of like that.

Car makers and dealers love horsepower. It sells cars. But real car guys look at a whole lot more than just horsepower because they know it takes more than that to make a car go fast. Torque, powerband, etc etc.

Marketing is marketing.
__________________
Never say die!

"A nation who forgets its defenders is soon forgotten itself."

"A good shot must necessarily be a good man since the essence of good marksmanship is self-control and self-control is the essential quality of a good man." – Theodore Roosevelt



delta13soultaker is offline   Reply With Quote