continued from 22WRF...
I would also like to schedule a meeting with you, for which I will fly to Washington, D.C. to personally meet with you in the short term.
Having been raised in the former Soviet Union, I am no stranger to horrors of communism, totalitarianism, civilian labor camp rule and
I see clearly the path Mr. Obama is taking the United States. It is a downward spiral of total destruction of the constitution and
economic infrastructure of this country. I urge you to look at the information thoroughly. Americans need to know that their president is
a legitimate president and that their senators and representatives are upholding their oaths:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” As a Senator you have to uphold your oath and initiate proper
committee and FBI investigation.
There are serious concerns about Mr. Obama’s identity and financial dealings. I have obtained a list of some 100 addresses under
the name of Barack Obama (and similar spellings). These addresses are attached to different social security numbers. As you know
the first three digits in a social security number signify the state. Those were issued all over the country. One of his social security
numbers, that was used while he was a law student at Harvard and attached to his address in Sommervile MA, was issued in Ct and
attached to a holder of this social security number , that is 118 years old. Clearly no human being can legally have dozens of different
social security numbers and Soetoro/Obama is not a 118 years old. I believe there is evidence of massive fraud and massive
financial fraud. I believe those units of Name/ss number/ addresses were used to fraction large campaign contributions and other
transactions. There is evidence of campaign contributions coming from countries like Libya, Uganda, Palestinian authority and Saudi
Arabia. Mr. Obama’s grandmother, Ms. Madelyn Dunham worked as a volunteer in probate department of the Oahu Circuit court and
had access to the Social security numbers of the deceased individuals, which might explain the findings. Mr. Obama’s mother Ann
Dunham, according to databases had numerous aliases and at least two social security numbers.
Mr. Obama was a chair of Annenberg challenge. Officially he collected 50 mln from Annenberg+110 million matching funds=160 mln
total. There were reports that due to fund swap with Annenberg per se he had as much as 500mln. This charity operated for 6 years
and was supposed to increase student performance in Academics. After 6 years there was zero improvement in comparison to other
schools in Chicago and it is not clear what happened to 500 mln donated. I saw their tax returns, they don’t show an explanation.
As a State Senator Mr. Obama was retained by his friend, Mr. Robert Blackwell, to represent him as an attorney. (Mr. Obama worked
for Miner law firm to supplement his 56K salary as a state senator ) Mr. Obama has used State Senator letterhead to solicit grants for
Mr. Robert Blackwell. Mr. Blackwell consequently received $320k in State grants for his company and paid Mr. Obama 100K as a
salary. Later upon inquiry Mr. Obama buried the payment he received from Mr. Blackwell amongst hundreds of names of the clients of
his firm. This was a clear case of public corruption, but Mr. Obama was never prosecuted, while other lawmakers are serving jail
terms for such actions.
While being sworn as an attorney in the State of IL, Mr Obama had to provide his personal information under oath. He was asked, if
he had any other names, he responded none. (I am in possession of his registration.) In reality he used name Barry Soetoro. I am in
possession of his school registration in Indonesia, that clearly shows his name to be Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonezia. Later it was
reported that he studied at Occidental college in Ca under the name Barry Soetoro and there was an entry in the journal of the
California assembly in re. to grants given to foreign exchange students, one Soetoro from Indonesia. Mr. Soetoro/Obama clearly
defrauded the State Bar if Illinois and perjured himself while concealing his identity. Anybody else would’ve been disbarred for this
and the matter would’ve been forwarded to the district attorney for prosecution for perjury and fraud, however nothing was done to Mr.
Obama. More importantly, why did he conceal his identity?
I request all of this information to be forwarded to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senate Finance Committee, Senate
Judicial Committee, Mr. Steven Whitlock, director of the whistle blower office of the IRS, ICE, State Department, and FBI for further
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
PS. It is my understanding, that in his stimulus package Mr. Obama has asked for 20 billion dollars for community based outreach
organizations. Congress has approved it and Senate is cutting the funds to 4 billion, but intending to approve. In the end of November
or 2008 I have formed a community based outreach organization DefendOurFreedoms.US. According to Alexa stat count, after only 2
months of existence, one and a half million readers visit my blog monthly and are working with me tirelessly exposing all the massive
fraud, surrounding Mr. Soetoro/Obama and defending our Constitution and our freedoms. Four billion dollars will be a great financial
help in this massive investigation and in protection of our Constitutional Republic. Please, advise how do I apply for this grant.
The problems and inconsistency with ANNENBERG’S FACTCHECK.ORG statements, images, and documents of which US
senators and representatives keep relying on as true and accurate.
Hawaii CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH vs. CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
What was posted was not a birth certificate, but something that resembles a "Certification of Live Birth" or COLB, which, even if
authentic, does not prove "natural born" U.S. citizenship. In Hawaii, a Certification of Live Birth is issued within a year of a child's birth
to those who register a birth abroad or one that takes place outside a hospital. An authentice Certificate of Live Birth would be issued
to someone born within the state of Hawaii.
BESIDE’S STATUTE 338-17.8 and other’s. see
§338-20.5 Adoption; foreign born persons. (a) The department of health shall establish a Hawaii certificate of birth for a person born
in a foreign country and for whom a final decree of adoption has been entered in a court of competent jurisdiction in Hawaii, when it
receives the following:
(1) A properly certified copy of the adoption decree, or certified abstract thereof on a form approved by the department; and
(2) A copy of any investigatory report and recommendation which may have been prepared by the director of social services; and
(3) A report on a form to be approved by the department of health setting forth the following:
(A) Date of assumption of custody;
(C) Color or race;
(D) Approximate age of child;
(E) Name and address of the person or persons adopting said child;
(F) Name given to child by adoptive parent or parents;
(G) True or probable country of birth.
The true or probable country of birth shall be known as the place of birth, and the date of birth shall be determined by approximation.
This report shall constitute an original certificate of birth; and
(4) A request that a new certificate of birth be established.
(b) After preparation of the new certificate of birth in the new name of the adopted person, the department of health shall seal and file
the certified copy of the adoptive decree, the investigatory report and recommendation of the director of human services if any, the
report constituting the original certificate of birth, and the request for a new certificate of birth. The sealed documents may be opened
by the department only by an order of a court of record or when requested in accordance with section 578-14.5 or 578-15. The new
certificate of birth shall show the true or probable foreign country of birth, and that the certificate is not evidence of United States
citizenship for the child for whom it is issued or for the adoptive parents. [L 1979, c 203, §3; am L 1990, c 338, §3]
§338-41 Issuance; procedure. (a) The department of health may make regulations respecting the form of Hawaiian birth certificates
and certified copies of such certificates and other matters relating to Hawaii birth certificates as appear necessary and the
regulations, when approved and made in accordance with chapter 91, shall have the force of law. The department shall furnish the
form of the certificates and copies made therefrom.
(b) Any certificate of Hawaiian birth issued heretofore under or by virtue of any law of the Territory of Hawaii or the State, shall be
prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated. [L 1911, c 96, §1; am L 1923, c 246, §1; RL 1925, §196; am L 1927, c 202, §1; RL
1935, §7610; RL 1945, §12910; am L 1951, c 132, §1; RL 1955, §57-40; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §9; am L 1965, c 96, §39; HRS §
338-41; am L 1970, c 11, §1; am L 1972, c 66, §1(4)]
Prima facie evidence overcome by competent evidence of nonidentification. 4 U.S.D.C. Haw. 258.
Certificate not controlling upon U.S. immigration officials re admission of Chinese. 217 F. 48; 35 Op. U.S. Att. Gen. 69.
OBAMA REFUSE'S TO SHOW HIS 'VAULTED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, PASSPORT, COLLEGE, AND COMPLETE MEDICAL
Read or Glance at many of the Laws on Hawaii Statutes:
or complete list of laws
Furthermore, Hawaii statements:
A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr.
Fukino said that she had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Senator Obama’s original
birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to resolve any of the questions
being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer database of the department or there is an actual “vault”
Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the “record” is a Certification of Live Birth, Certificate of Live Birth, or a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation, including a signature of an
attending physician, is different from a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth was the
result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up to
one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any
of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Article II of the Constitution does not allow for dual-citizenship or allegiance to another country.
In addition to the above, Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, 8 USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born
citizens upon "taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state ... after having
attained the age of eighteen years," in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Simply put, since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship,
if Obama got that passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.
“So, if the experts are right, Obama forged a Certification of Live Birth to fool America. In addition to the automatic Indonesian
citizenship granted to a child acknowledged as a "son" by an Indonesian male citizen, and the Indonesian citizenship listed in
Obama's school records, Obama then traveled to a place where Americans weren't allowed to go, but citizens of Indonesia were. If
he obtained an Indonesian passport on his trip in 1981, he effectively renounced any American citizenship he may have had and
cannot serve as president (or "rule" as president, as members of his campaign have stated). These are serious questions that must
But beyond the birth certificate issue, there's the matter that Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan, Southern India and Kenya in
1981. He said he went to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemed plausible, except for the fact that his mother returned to Hawaii in
August of 1980 to file for a divorce from her second husband, Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she
divorced, she wasn't there at the time of Obama's visit.
There's another problem. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior to the one he received once becoming a U.S.
senator has been found. If he traveled to Pakistan with an American passport, he wouldn't have been allowed in – since Pakistan was
in turmoil in 1981 and under martial law. It was also on the State Department's travel ban list for U.S. citizens.
If he couldn't get into Pakistan with a U.S. passport, perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get
one of those is if you are an Indonesian citizen.
That's quite possible since under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son – in this case
Obama – to be an Indonesian state citizen, which was also recorded by Obama's school record.
So, if he didn't go to Indonesia in 1981 to visit mom (who had returned to Hawaii by then), might it have something to do with the fact
that Indonesian passports expire every five years and it was time for renewal?” Source (WorldNetDaily, November 25, 2008)
SELECTIVE SERVICE FORM PROBLEMS:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (source: Debbie Schlussel):
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and,
instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service
registration commit the crime for him?
It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend
of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act
request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.
But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers.
And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before
it was required by law.
The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama's Selective Service registration card and accompanying
documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next
Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his,
then it's proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law. By law, he
was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.
But the Selective Service System registration ("SSS Form 1") and accompanying computer print-out ("SSS Print-out), below,
released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in
2008 and backdated:
* Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008
First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS
Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case "0897080632," which I've labeled as "A" on both the SSS Form and
the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the
number to make it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008
As the retired federal agent notes:
Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of
the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout
is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And
1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect
this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a "corrected" DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs
issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of
the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?
It's quite a "coincidence" . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.
Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama's lack of having done so, and that the
person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to "80" instead of the current "08". They either forgot to fake the
DLN number or couldn't do so.
And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded? Lucky for Obama, it's his native Chicago. From an
article entitled, "Post Office Registration Process", on the Selective Service website:
When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he
completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in
the man's registration.
Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System's Data Management System
(DMC) near Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities. Each card is then microfilmed and
stamped with a sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is reviewed to account for all documents and to
ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are keyed and then verified by a different data
The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described
on pages 7-8 of this Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to "08" in error.
So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 DLN?!
* Obama's Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form,
labeled as "B". On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as "FEB" (February), and the year is either "80" or "90". The
retired federal agent investigated further:
Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either
a "80" or a "90".
But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRA...8002-3240-001#
apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a "Request for a new OMB control number" for SSS Form 1
(see also, here)--meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in "FEB 1980".
Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter
I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it's nearly
impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama's SSS Form 1 to be dated "Feb 1980." And since that makes it almost certainly
dated "Feb 1990," then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply
The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002,
labeled as "C". The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear * Barack Obama's Signature is Dated
After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature
Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1's "Today's date" as July 30, 1980, labeled "D". But the Postal Stamp reflects the
PREVIOUS day's date of July 29, 1980, labeled "E". Yes, Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and
much more unlikely for someone to put a future date than a past date. (Also note how Barry made such a "cute" peace sign with the
"b" inside the "O" of his signature. Touching.)
* Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970
Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The "postmark" stamp--labeled "E"--is hard to read, but it is clear
that at the bottom is "USPO" which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current "postmark" validator, registry, or
round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows "USPS" for United States Postal Service. The change from
Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal
legislation since the founding of the Republic--Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1,
Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that
just happened to be Barack Obama's suspicious Selective Service registration form?
* Form Shows Barack Obama didn't have ID
The SSS Form 1 states "NO ID", labeled "F". Since that's the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter
was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they
determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?
* The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.
The retired federal agent who FOIA'd Barack Obama's Selective Service Registration Form notes:
Early this year, when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:
Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm
with our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.
Janice L. Hughes/SSS
Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was
filed on September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?
On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama
could not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the classes of which
commenced August 24, 1980.
Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page
Where is Obama's Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the card?
And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request
prior to the request having been made:
The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled "G"], but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled "H"]. My FOIA was dated
October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA? I gave them no "heads up" that I was sending it. In
fact it was not mailed until late October--around the 25th.
Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled "I"].
Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what's on it?
A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service registration
was faked. Either he signed the fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft
(and lied about it).
Which is it?
It's incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn't register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.
The documents indicate it's one or the other.