The Firearms Forum - Gun Community - View Single Post - The Second Amendment---Broken down

belercous · 10-28-2009, 01:53 AM

Ooh, geez, don't you people go to bed? I'm trying, and after what I've drank, its easy.
Alright.

Hardballer: Yes, I have read that years ago. What you are citing is one primarily one view and the others, simply are not credible sources. The actual congressional deliberatations were never put down for posterity. In so much as the Const. goes, the best source we have for the actual debates are James Madison's notes. And as much as it may surprise you, Conress actualy did debate things back then, most especially when the Const. was about to be altered.

By the way, I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on tv. I have the same training a lawyer does, but I'm not a lawyer.

Yeah, like I'm running and hiding. Sure, "cut & run," kinda like Reagan in Lebanon. No, I'm here. I think I've already enjoined the debate, (look the word up, please) I'd rather just join the debate.

I'm so glad that you "KNOW" what the Constitution means, all them edumacated S.C. justices for well over 200 yrs. don't have the insight that you posess. You must have been born with a silver gun in your mouth to have such a superior understanding of the Const., history, fact and reality be damned.

Marlin T: I have no idea about what you mean. Oh yeah, I see now. He isn't not oo brights is he? Good catch.

10-28-2009, 01:53 AM	#24
belercous Former Guest Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 195	Re: The Second Amendment---Broken down Ooh, geez, don't you people go to bed? I'm trying, and after what I've drank, its easy. Alright. Hardballer: Yes, I have read that years ago. What you are citing is one primarily one view and the others, simply are not credible sources. The actual congressional deliberatations were never put down for posterity. In so much as the Const. goes, the best source we have for the actual debates are James Madison's notes. And as much as it may surprise you, Conress actualy did debate things back then, most especially when the Const. was about to be altered. By the way, I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on tv. I have the same training a lawyer does, but I'm not a lawyer. Yeah, like I'm running and hiding. Sure, "cut & run," kinda like Reagan in Lebanon. No, I'm here. I think I've already enjoined the debate, (look the word up, please) I'd rather just join the debate. I'm so glad that you "KNOW" what the Constitution means, all them edumacated S.C. justices for well over 200 yrs. don't have the insight that you posess. You must have been born with a silver gun in your mouth to have such a superior understanding of the Const., history, fact and reality be damned. Marlin T: I have no idea about what you mean. Oh yeah, I see now. He isn't not oo brights is he? Good catch.