Originally Posted by Bobitis
The fact that the NRA won't support either one of them speaks volumes to me.
They are backpedaling on Reid due to the members concerns, and an endorsement of his opponent would likely cost him a re-election.
Can't have that can we.
It's the same tactic they used in the contribution case. Fight until it becomes adventagous not to. Regardless of who wins, they can now claim a victory of sorts.
Not endorsing Reid's opponent is the same as endorsing him. Reid gets it anyway.
Am I the only one who can see this?
Yes, I see it too, totally agree. And now, they'll use whatever the outcome is to fund raise. It's ridiculous, and the main reason I'm no longer a member. Sacrificing core principles for money is the sure way to disaster in the long run, and they will find that out, too late I'm sure.