View Single Post
Old 03-09-2011, 10:43 AM   #11
polishshooter
Advanced Senior Member
 
polishshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,860
Default Re: 1858 remington army target model

Hey guys, is this ".44 Navy" thing a relatively new trend?

In all my historical reading and then when I got into shooting cap n balls heavily maybe 20 years ago the nomenclature was pretty standard....

....."Navy" (even if used by the ARMY) were all .36...and...
....."Army" (even if used by the NAVY) were all .44.

I think maybe guys were confused because many original 1860 ARMY revolvers came with the etched Naval Battle Scene on the cylinder????

But anyway, I got away from shooting them for a few years then low and behold when I start checking catalogues again I start seeing ".44 NAVY revolvers," "Brass Frame .44s...." and it is getting confusing.

I mean, YES they had a LOT of brass framed revolvers in the Civil War, especially on the CSA side (I think the Rigdon MAY have been a .44 as well as a .36 if I remember right?)

But MOST were .36 NAVYs, and back when I shot them that was all the brass frames you could get...in fact I still have our CVA Brass 1851 that my son and I built from a kit in like 1992....

But I STRONGLY prefer my Traditions 1860 Army, STEEL, and yes, with the "Naval" scene!
__________________
The problems we face today are
there because the people who work
for a living are outnumbered by those
who vote for a living.
polishshooter is offline   Reply With Quote