View Single Post
Old 05-08-2012, 08:31 PM   #21
mjp28
Advanced Senior Member
 
mjp28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: anytown, OHIO
Contributor
Posts: 3,047
Default Re: B-17, B-24, B-29, or Lancaster?

I'm a BIG WWII buff and probably have seen every History, Military Channel and every other show out there on WWII.

The European Theater was the real media show in WWII so a lot was shown, at least for the US audience of the Eigth Air Force and all the B-17 raids into Germany. Plus the B-17 was mass produced in American factories! A sturdy work horse with many, many sorties -but- I think the Lancaster was a better overall bomber.

On the B-24 and B-25 it depends on usage but overall the B-25 was faster and basically turned into an 8 (or more) .50 cal gunship that could drop bombs...nasty combimation! Tore the Japanese up in the Pacific.

B-29 was an engineering marvel, perfect for carrying massive bombloads to burn Toyko and Japan down and killed more people than Fat Man and Little Boy together....which the B-29 was well suited to drop.

Best overall plane that won the war? The P-51 Mustang! Ford even named it's new 1964 car after it...not a pony which is what caught on.

(also the Chevy Corvette was named after the WWII Corvette class ships, hmmm)

Last edited by mjp28; 05-08-2012 at 08:34 PM..
mjp28 is offline   Reply With Quote