Originally Posted by JohnHenry
How come I've never heard of our "dear leader" being called a "mulatto" ( which is by defination what he is ) ?
I hear him refered to as being "black" .... which is only half correct, he could
just as well be called a "white man" .
When people say that I'm against him because he's black .... my normal reply is that I find his white half just as wrong as his black half.
If you speak the truth you will be labeled a racist by the lamestream.
If his white heritage helped him with his base, he'd be calling himself white.
It doesn't seem to make sense, because it doesn't. Double standards are the standard today.
Remember, if it weren't for double standards, libs wouldn't have any at all.