|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Central AZ (Yavapai County)
Posts: 653
|
Malia Obama’s Spring Break Vacation to Mexico Cost US Taxpayers $115,500.
![]() http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...payers-115500/ JudicialWatch.org reports the following: Cost to Taxpayers: $115,500.87. Judicial Watch today released records detailing the government funds expended on First Daughter Malia Obama’s March 2012 Spring Break vacation to Mexico. According to the records, obtained from the US Secret Service as a result of a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on September 20, 2012, the total cost of the trip amounted to $115,500.87 (Judicial Watch v. US Secret Service (No. 12-cv-01562)). The following is a breakdown of the costs as detailed in the documents: Ground transportation: $23,964.81 Lodging: $21,682.92 Airfare: $47,767.34 “Vouchers”: $21,636.14 (not itemized) Support Charges: $449.66 (travel for one from Mexico City to Oaxaca, not itemized) Malia Obama’s spring break trip evoked controversy after the Obama White House reportedly ordered the removal of press reports detailing the trip. On March 19, 2012, numerous online press outlets reported that the president’s 13-year-old daughter, Malia Obama, was on a Spring Break trip to Mexico accompanied by 25 US Secret Service Agents and as many as 12 of her friends. However, shortly after the press reports surfaced they were quickly removed from the Internet. The trip took place shortly after the Texas Department of Public Safety issued a statement advising students on Spring Break “to avoid Mexico.”
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 280
|
But but but ...the upper 2% are not paying their fair share .......
ooops we are not included in that ..besides you taxpayers are footing the bill . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 2,772
|
Moooooo.......
Jacqueline Kennedy should have been awarded HALF the staff moo requires........ Not only would she be deserving......but most likely would have declined the attention. Difference is....Jackie did not need a makeover to greet the cameras...... The moo not only needs it, but still has not found any makeup artist that is qualified to have her ready by camera time ! oink.
__________________
http://www.nranews.com/#/nranews, "ozo. you're off your rocker sir." -johnlives4christ ![]() http://www.prisonplanet.com/ -America,Bless GOD- |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|