|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
The question here is does military surplus 30-06 ammo "fit and fire safely" in a civilian 30-06????
My intent is to fire it out of a Rossi wizard 30-06
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 415
|
Yes.
This cartridge can be referred to as.... .30-06 .30 Cal. (military nomenclature) Or- M2 (this being the 150 gr. milspec .30-06) They are all safe to fire in commercial .30-06 rifles. ![]() But, a great deal of milsurp .30-06 is corrosive. So take the proper measures after firing.
__________________
"Do not stand beside the road and argue with a fool...lest others in passing take you also for a fool." Last edited by B27; 09-26-2012 at 05:50 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
good thinkin
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Mil surp .30-'06 is getting scarce as it was being phased out in the U.S. as early as 1957. If you plan on long term storage, make sure the age. I have fired ammo that was 100+ years old and most fired, but I wouldn't store anything over about 10 years old and preferably new ammo. Unless you rotate your store, it will just get older and older. Starting with ammo that is already 60 years old is not a good idea.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
see i got a heap of 1916 left but getting through it , then theres the 1917 and 1919 stuff
( all .303 ball ) , i do sell some and its still very good ammo ( if the case was intact , i've had a few opened and corroded lots and ended up tossed the lot each time ) and i've a pile of 1992 30-06 ( malaysian navy ammo ) but i'll get through that before the 1917 stuff ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 218
|
I was surprised to find a lot of the surplus WWI .30-06 ball ammo loaded with a bundle of long threads of a stick cordite type propellent which extended from the back of the bullet back to the primer. We lit some of the cordite threads in an ash tray and it burned almost like a small bit of C4. The 90 year old stick propellent looked strange as all get out, but it worked just fine in our range shooting applications. Most surprising.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
I had a Mk19 40mm rd denonate in the feed tray in Nam-propellant charge only. NOT an experience I would want to repeat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: florida
Contributor
Posts: 4,463
|
brit ammo commonly used cordite.. I've seen plenty of 303 cordite loaded ammo.
as for 30-06.... i have and have seen lots of 60's ? era greek milsurp.. have heard horror stories about some 30-06.. perhaps korean? that was have case head separations like crazy.. anyone else hear about this? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
All I know is that the U.S. never used cordite, but .30-'06 ammo made elsewhere might have been loaded with it.
The concern with old ammo is not that it is going to blow up the gun, it is that it won't fire. If the S really does HTF, you don't want ammo that is dead on arrival. Plus, why stock up on corrosive primed ammo when non-corrosive is available. But the old corrosive primers were pretty stable, which is why they survived through WWII. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Do not stand beside the road and argue with a fool...lest others in passing take you also for a fool." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: florida
Contributor
Posts: 4,463
|
i have a few hundred in greek milsurp in the SHTF cave, and have another couple hundred empties from said greek that I've prepped and have been reloading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 1,443
|
I have .30-06 that I know is well over 60-70 years old and fires great...
__________________
MORS DE CONTACTUS-DEATH ON CONTACT |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Non-corrosive primers came into general use in the early to mid-1930's and there was a lot of pressure on the military to adopt them, especially since the semi-auto rifle then coming into production would benefit from them. Army Ordnance resisted (and took a lot of heat), claiming that the stability of the new primers had not been proven. With the need to store millions of rounds of ammunition for indefinite periods in varying climates, the Army felt it could not authorize use of untried primers. The results were that the new M1 rifle had a gas cylinder and piston head made of stainless steel (then a rare and expensive material), and that millions of WWII GI's had to clean their rifles.
The M1 carbine was the exception. The designer (Williams) and first manufacturer (Winchester) told the Army that unless non-corrosive primers were used, the carbine would rapidly turn into a large paperweight. The Army made an exception, since they considered the carbine a wartime expedient and not a "real" battle rifle. But those Ordnance folks were right. Not long ago I decided to shoot up some 8mm Mauser ammo made in Canada in 1940 for the British (it was used in their tank machineguns) that had non-corrosive primers. All of it either had hang fires or didn't fire at all. But .30-'06 GI ammo from the same period, loaded with the old FA-70 corrosive primers, fired every time. More recent non-corrosive primers appear to be very stable, but those early mixtures just weren't. Jim Last edited by Jim K; 09-28-2012 at 04:40 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
I sincerely hope you are wrong and it never "all falls apart."
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: florida
Contributor
Posts: 4,463
|
the writing is on the wall and it's already falling apart!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West, TX
Contributor
Posts: 1,257
|
My grandfather passed me down a full case of World War 2 Match 30-06. The bullet weight was 177gr. They were in Gerand clips. The only bad thing was that back then the primers were corrosive. Anytime I shot them I had to run my rifle under hot water to wash it out. Kind of pain.
Sorry, I got a little off topic. To answer your question, yes, military and civilian 30-06 is identical. Last edited by bluesea112; 10-03-2012 at 10:06 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West, TX
Contributor
Posts: 1,257
|
We have been on a slipper slope downwards ever since the Democrats passed the Gun Control Act in 1968. It is just a matter of time. We fight and fight to keep our rights, but every once in a while they get another control law passed. Once a law is passed, it never goes away. Eventually they have complete control and you are stripped of your rights. Obama just wants too speed that along.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 30-06 ammo |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|