The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearms > Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2012, 08:36 AM   #26
soundguy
Advanced Senior Member
 
soundguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: florida
Contributor
Posts: 4,463
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Quote:
Originally Posted by carver View Post
Though I love the double action revolvers, but when you get to the .44 mag, and larger, double action revolvers are a waste of money. I can empty a .38 revolver in seconds, and hit what I'm shooting at. It takes longer to do the same with a double action .44 mag due to recoil.
i agree.. I can dump 4 of my 5 shots out of my tarus 85 or my smith 38 in the time ittakes to get 1 off in the larger ones.

mind you.. as long as we are shooting accurately.. either will do it

the 44m is just not practical for me to 'carry' it's a colt anaconda.. so to 'carry' it I'd need a trench coat or something..

a 38 snubby I can pocket.. or paddle holster IWB.. etc..
soundguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 04:02 PM   #27
gvw3
Advanced Senior Member
 
gvw3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago IL Area
Contributor
Posts: 3,305
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

After shooting my 44 mag my 357 seems like a 22. I can't believe how accurate this gun is. I don't need or want any gun more powerful than this.

Name:  Ruger 44 mag.JPG
Views: 140
Size:  131.5 KB
__________________
Criminals advocate stronger gun laws to foster a safer work environment. This limits their exposure to risk.
gvw3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 10:34 PM   #28
Jackman
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 446
Thumbs up Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

SoundGuy and Carver good reading and excellent comparison Carver on the 38 versus 44 I can relate my 1911 45acp versus the 1906 38acp 45 rapid fire all over the target board with 38 rapid firer much tighter pattern....

i want and will get a 357 mag or 44 mag soon , looked at the 500 SW today nice piece and appears massive nut trying for an older Colt.
Jackman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 11:25 PM   #29
Rogeritall
V.I.P. Member
 
Rogeritall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 173
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackman View Post
SoundGuy and Carver good reading and excellent comparison Carver on the 38 versus 44 I can relate my 1911 45acp versus the 1906 38acp 45 rapid fire all over the target board with 38 rapid firer much tighter pattern....

i want and will get a 357 mag or 44 mag soon , looked at the 500 SW today nice piece and appears massive nut trying for an older Colt.
If I ever get another .357 Magnum, I would love to find a Colt Python with a six inch or so barrel. I had an older Dan Wesson .357mag (15-2 model I think?) with the eight inch barrel that had the vented rib, and under lug, but I had to sell it due to company lay off. Man I wish I had it back, I took my first whitetail deer with that revolver. But I've always had a hankering for a Colt Python. Maybe someday...

Here's a photo of the Dan Wesson I had... Note the Deer antlers are not yet finalized as far as mounting them, that was just a pre-fit.
__________________
"Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire!' in a crowded theater."

-- Peter Venetoklis

Last edited by Rogeritall; 11-15-2012 at 11:37 PM..
Rogeritall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 11:35 PM   #30
Dog Soldier
V.I.P. Member
 
Dog Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Great Desert
Posts: 154
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Eastwood was not using a Mdl. 29 S&W .44 Mag in that movie. That was a Mdl 57 S&W .41 Mag. dedicated hand gunners spotted that small bore right away. They said they were unable to find a Mdl.29 at that time. The props dept. rented the Mdl.57 from a private gun owner.
Dog Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 05:58 AM   #31
Bindernut
Advanced Senior Member
 
Bindernut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,453
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dog Soldier View Post
Eastwood was not using a Mdl. 29 S&W .44 Mag in that movie. That was a Mdl 57 S&W .41 Mag. dedicated hand gunners spotted that small bore right away. They said they were unable to find a Mdl.29 at that time. The props dept. rented the Mdl.57 from a private gun owner.
Yes I do believe that a Mod 57 was used in the movie. I read that in an article about movie guns and Hollywood prop houses (G&A or Shooting Times quite a few years back).

But, I would like to meet the person that could tell the difference in a .410" and a .429" muzzle diameter off of a film frame.
I have a heck of a time sorting .41 and .44 brass out of the tumbler...and that's with them in hand.
Bindernut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 01:56 PM   #32
soundguy
Advanced Senior Member
 
soundguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: florida
Contributor
Posts: 4,463
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogeritall View Post
If I ever get another .357 Magnum, I would love to find a Colt Python with a six inch or so barrel. I had an older Dan Wesson .357mag (15-2 model I think?) with the eight inch barrel that had the vented rib, and under lug, but I had to sell it due to company lay off. Man I wish I had it back, I took my first whitetail deer with that revolver. But I've always had a hankering for a Colt Python. Maybe someday...

Here's a photo of the Dan Wesson I had... Note the Deer antlers are not yet finalized as far as mounting them, that was just a pre-fit.
pythons are nice.. i almost got one over my anaconda.. but the anaconda was actually a better financial deal. the deale rhad some guy walk out on a pre-order sale sticking him with the gun.. was a small dealer and he only ordere din like 1-2 guns at a time.. ( this was a LOOOng time back ).. and that anaconda represented 50% of his operating capitol to order in guns.. and not many people were buying hand cannon.. he gave it to me for his 'shipped' price.. i couldn't pass it up.

if you want a funny 357.. get one of those COP357 derrengers..
soundguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 11:21 AM   #33
Highpower3006
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 28
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Everyone should have a .44 Magnum at least once in their life. They are accurate and using ammo loaded to .44 special specs, they are pleasant to shoot.

Years ago I wanted a .44 mag so bad I could taste it. After a ton of research via reading magazine articles (this was in the days before Al Gore invented the internet), I bought a Ruger Super Blackhawk. I hated the way that gun punished my hand with full power factory loads and sold it after a mere 50 rounds. I used the money that I got back out of it and bought a Model 29 S&W with a 4" barrel.

It was like night and day as far as felt recoil. The same loads that hurt me in the Ruger were quite manageable in the Smith. I have a Ruger New Model Blackhawk in .357 and even with the stoutest loads it doesn't punish me like that SBH did.

I don't believe that anyone would argue that the shape and width of the grips have everything to do with how recoil is felt by the shooter. I have smaller hands, yet the factory S&W target grips feel the best for me even though they are rather large. Unless it is being shot out of a small revolver, the .357 round is very manageable out of most of the guns that are chambered for it.

Both of my .44 Mags are Smiths, the old Model 29 and a newer 629-4 Classic DX. The 29 still has the factory targets on it and the 629 has the factory Hogue rubber grips. Even though the 629 is much heaver, the 29 is more pleasant to shoot using the same loads.

The .44's


Notice the difference in the rear profiles. The 29 is much wider and, IMO, distributes the recoil better.


In my modest collection I have a Python, a S&W M66, a Ruger GP100, and the NM Blackhawk and they are all relatively pleasant to shoot .357's through even though the grips are different from each other. I do find the the single action type grip seems to produce the most felt recoil.

The .357's.
Highpower3006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 12:23 PM   #34
Tom
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 197
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

For those who like shooting full power .44, the Dan Wesson 744 is a good candidate. Even with a light 6" barrel it weighs about 56 oz.
Attached Images
 
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 08:30 PM   #35
Fast Forward
Senior Member
 
Fast Forward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chaska Minn
Posts: 529
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Finnaly got one ,,,been on my Gun Bucket list for a while
Attached Images
  
Fast Forward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 08:40 PM   #36
76Highboy
Advanced Senior Member
 
76Highboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Contributor
Posts: 6,969
Default Re: But, seein as this here's a 44 Magnum...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Forward View Post
Finnaly got one ,,,been on my Gun Bucket list for a while
Oh heck, now you can shoot the bucket since you have knocked it over. Very nice gun and I just love a blued gun, especially a Smith. What generation is it?
76Highboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com