|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: El Salvador, Central America.
Posts: 1,030
|
Which of the following wou'ld you say was the best WWII bolt action? Personally, I'll pick the Enfield.
Kar 98k Lee-Enfield MK IV Mosin Nagant Other (specifie)
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: El Salvador, Central America.
Posts: 1,030
|
Sorry, the poll is somewhere else. Hey it's my first time, you know? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,863
|
Yeah, this one was going for awhile, but I'll stick my two cents in anyway!
The SMLE hands down. And NOT just because I just bought an Ishapore Mk III 2A on Wednesday EITHER.... ![]()
__________________
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deep South Mississippi
Posts: 5,943
|
Either the Enfield or the mosin nagant
__________________
Only you can see this
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 13,094
|
Mauser Karibiner achtzehn hundert acht und neunzehn!
Hands down. ![]()
__________________
--Pistolenschutze (Pistol Shooter) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
|
K98 hands down the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
|
I would have to go with the Enfield. I remember reading a quote, can't remember from who, that stated the Springfield was the best shooters rifle, the Mauser was the best made rifle, but the Enfield was the best Battle rifle.
From all accounts I've read the Enfield was easier to produce then the Mauser, more robust then the Springfield, easier to maintain in the field then either of those and had a higher magazine capacity. Everything you would want in a rifle for general issue.
__________________
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the arguments of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
|
The Enfield's best feature is the bolt that cocks on closing; it enables a fairly rapid rate of fire for a bolt action weapon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
|
ROSS MODEL 1905
stir, stir, stir... best regards, mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Big D
Posts: 8
|
Enfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,636
|
Waitasec...The ROSS?!?!?!
Is this the straight-pull that was so poorly designed it would get reassembled incorrectly, causing all sorts of failures in the field? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 13,094
|
Quote:
__________________
--Pistolenschutze (Pistol Shooter) Last edited by Pistolenschutze; 09-12-2008 at 08:33 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
|
Sorry...
but you are both wrong. the ROSS MODEL 1910 had a bolt that utilized an interupted thread design, wich could be re-assembled incorrectly, causing the bolt to fail to lock into the receiver... the Model 1905 (i own 2 examples) does not have this problem. its the most accuratte production contract military bolt action rifle ever made... you guys are passing on and spreading a negative firearms myth... one of my Ross Model 1905 rifles is US ord bomb and "screaming eagle head" proofed / the US military purchased about 10,000... the "problem" with early Ross rifles was realy an ammo problem... anyone who owns a SMLE rifle knows that the chambers are sloppy / oversized... this was done deliberatly, to accomadate ammo produced in differant countries, differant time periods, to differant standards, stored under differant conditions... the original Ross rifles had match spec / grade chambers, and would not function with ammo that did not meet those standards... this was solved by introducing the LC modification... LARGE CHAMBER (LC) variants had there chambers "improved" to accept all encountered ammo. i hate when firearm myths are perpetuated... thats one of the reasons i buy many guns, to find out the truth behind the myth. its a topic worth reseraching, if you have the time. best regards, mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 13,094
|
Are we talking about the same rifle, Mike? I don't claim to be any sort of expert on these rifles, but the sources I've consulted do seem to indicate there were many, many problems with them. Mostly those problems had to do with poor production controls, but there was also a tendency for the rifles to become too easily clogged with dirt and mud in a field environment, and thus unreliable. There was, in fact, a major diplomatic blowup between Canada and Great Britain over production rights to the Lee Enfield, which apparently led to the development of the Ross during the Boer War. The design was supposed to be an original, but in reality it was based on the Steyr as was later proven.
And yes, you're right, a discussion of old weapons like these is always fun. http://world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl24-e.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_rifle
__________________
--Pistolenschutze (Pistol Shooter) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 384
|
compare the bolt designs between the 1910 model and the 1905 model...
most folks are unaware that there are several differant models or that there are major design differances among them... the dirt in chamber / failure to function in mud was an ammo problem, not an action design issue (see above referanced LC statement) the model 1910 interrupted thread bolt design did suffer under these conditions, but not the models that came before it... production quaulity of the 1905 model is superb, match grade / custom target rifle quality... won the Wimbldon (sp) championships many times... i have fired mine under adverse conditions with differant / mixed ammo without proper cleaning... it works fine. the US would not have purchased 10,000 of them if they were defective. the gun in your picture is not the infamous Model 1910... i did not know the story before i purchased the gun... and tested it. it functions better and is more accuratte that my K31 or .236 LEE-NAVY. dig deeper, its a story worth learning. best regards, mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pensacola florida
Posts: 871
|
1903a3 or the 1903 us military bolt action 30-06 and thats picking them above my swede 96's, my k-31 swiss, and my 1891 ruskie nagant. i personally prefer the m14/m1a but we are talking bolt guns here.
blackhawkkid308
__________________
9-11-01 lest we forget AMEN |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|