The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Military > General Military Arms & History Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2008, 05:12 PM   #1
notabiker
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
Default recoiless rifle

why did the recoiless rifle go out of favor ?. much firepower and very portable. seen them on jeeps in the 60s

-->
notabiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 12:16 AM   #2
JohnK3
Advanced Senior Member
 
JohnK3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,636
Default Re: recoiless rifle

Simple: outperformed and outclassed by alternate technology.

Man-portable rockets provide superior performance in a lighter package. If you need more firepower than the man-portable variety, vehicle mounted rockets are much deadlier than the recoilless rifle.

Consider the LAW rocket. Lightweight, capable of penetrating most armor that the recoilless rifle was capable of penetrating and easier to carry, as it did not require a long, cumbersome tube.

Moving up in technolgoy, we get to the TOW, M47 Dragon and other anti-tank weapons that are guided in flight and therefore much more accurate than the RR. There are also larger, even more accurate weapons systems that can be mounted on vehicles.
JohnK3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 10:46 AM   #3
MOS0311
V.I.P. Member
 
MOS0311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: recoiless rifle

Most common recoilles rifle calibers were 73,82 and 107mm
We got disposable one shot 84mm AT4s and 83mm SMAWs today.


You can bring these up on rooftops as easy as medium MGs and blow up or weaken walls or doors.

Last edited by MOS0311; 02-26-2008 at 10:47 AM..
MOS0311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 11:17 PM   #4
Patrolman
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kansas City, Ks.
Posts: 3
Default Re: recoiless rifle

My MOS in the Corps was 0351, one of the listed weapons of that MOS was the 106 Recoilless Rifle. I was on one in Gitmo in 1972. I shot it once at 3 55 gallon barrels welded together floating out in the sea, probably about 500 yards out. I just shot over the top of them. The rifles we had mounted on early 1950s style jeeps, with a holddown slot in the windshield and bracket. We also had Mule vehicles, like early ATVs. The idea was for two rifle crews to work together on a tank from both sides. Shoot the aiming .50 sighting barrel with a tracer round, make aiming adjustments if necessary, then fire the 106 round. The crew immediately had to manuever the gun back on the Mule and get out fast, because if you didn't kill the tank, it had a returning round at you immediately. You telegraphed your position with muzzle flash, and dust kicked up.
To go against tanks was probably a suicide mission.
It was used some in Vietnam for direct fire support of your immediate area.
Semper Fi
Patrolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com