|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
|
I have a S&W model 39 S/N 7452
Can anyone tell me when it was manufactured and what is it worth.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,485
|
Is it a steel frame or alloy frame? with a serial number of 7452 I would guess it would be an alloy frame, but why should I guess when you can tell us. Value is hard to dertermine with out pictures.
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
if it's a steel frame you have a collector gun on your hands. very limited numbers were made. if it's a "normal" model 39 and it was made between 1955 and 1956. somewhere in the early 60's the design was changed a bit and it was a 39-2 , somewhat more reliable with a improved ejector. adopted by the Illinois state police as their standard duty gun in the mid - 60's in my opinion it never got the credit it deserved as an excelent handgun. need pictures to help determine the condition and value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
Yes, if it happens to be a steel M-39 it's VERY rare. There are rumors of such, but I have never seen one. However if steel, it most likely a later Model 539...... a production model with a run of somewhere in the area of 3000 pieces. Here is a pic of my personal 539........modified, but carried on duty for about 12 years of my 35 year law enforcement career. This came in after I had carried one Colt Police Possitive and two different S&W wheel guns, and when our Dept. finally decided to go to the Smith autos........shows you how long ago I started, huh? We did have a couple of M-39's, but all issued guns were 39-2's and later. The early 39's were officer owned as well as was my 539. Mike P.S. Notice that the backstrap is alloy, like all of the original M-39's. They just kept that piece and made the short run of 539's wothout making steel backstraps. ![]() Last edited by grampawmike; 08-20-2010 at 11:06 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
yep my bad..... the proper name is indeed the extractor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,485
|
Acturaly the steel frame guns were made first, but the alloy guns were sold first. The sreel frame guns fall into 39000/60000-64000 and again in the range of 81000/82000. IAW the SCofS&W.
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,485
|
Quote:
I have absolutely no ideal, perhaps a E-mail to S&W is in order. Being an expert only in finding the dinner table I can only go by the S&W book. Perhaps it is a re issue, one returned to the factory with a cracked alloy frame, repaired and re issued with a steel frame and the same serial number( book states that was standard ). Unless you bought the gun new way back when, that is a very real possibility. Now if you bought the gun new in the box I have no other ideals other than a early series not listed.![]()
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,485
|
I would think this is a case for a S&W letter. How ever I have found that any manual, tech book. history book or whatever is out dated the second it comes off the press, and is subject for correction. Some times the errors are compounded by others relying on that information and is only caught by someone such as your self who says " Whoa, that can't be right" because you have the evidence in your hands.
![]()
__________________
RonJames Last edited by RJay; 08-20-2010 at 04:01 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,Quebec CANADA
Posts: 173
|
Last edited by Luis Fernando; 08-20-2010 at 04:12 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
That whole area is and always has been badly confused, and based on what I have read, I don't think even the S&W folks know the whole story. One thing is interesting; the SA model was introduced to the trade first (1954); the DA model came later.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
I believe that the S/A model is the M-52 target gun in .38 wadcutter, the M-39 did follow that one and was presented for possible miltary contract in competition with the Beretta which did become our military sidearm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,Quebec CANADA
Posts: 173
|
9 mm Automatic Pistol
Double Action Model 39 (Shooter's Bible 1983 Edition) [IMG]http: 38 Master Model No.52 (Shooter's Bible 1989 Edition) [IMG]http: From Firearms 2010 Standard Catalog - Dan Shideler [IMG]http: [IMG]http: Luis Fernando Last edited by Luis Fernando; 08-21-2010 at 02:45 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
The SA version was designated the Model 44, even though it never went beyond pre-production, with less than 100 made. It is one of the rarest S&W's. None of my references from 1954-55 give it any model number, only "the S&W 9mm pistol," so it is possible that model number was posthumous, so to speak. I can't say what is marked on the gun, because I have never seen one, or even a good picture.
Jim Last edited by Jim K; 08-21-2010 at 02:30 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Posts: 112
|
My 39-2 has a S/N of A297xxx. Any idea of when it was made?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,Quebec CANADA
Posts: 173
|
Smith & Wesson 39
Notes: Immediately after World War 2, Carl Hellstrom (the president of Smith & Wesson at the time) saw the large number of automatic pistols used by both sides during the war and saw that the American public would be fascinated by them. He thus designed the Smith & Wesson 39 and insisted it be marketed, despite the fact that previous Smith & Wesson automatic pistols had been dismal commercial failures. The 39 seemed to also be a failure until the late 1950s, and in 1967, the Illinois State Police became the first police agency to equip with the Model 39. There was some small use by US personnel in Vietnam, and then the US Navy modified the Model 39 into a silenced weapon (the Mk22 Mod 0 "Hush Puppy"). Most Model 39s are made of blued or phosphated steel, but Model 439 variant uses a carbon finish, and the Model 639 variant is made of stainless steel. Virtually all subsequent Smith & Wesson pistols can trace their ancestry more or less to the Model 39. The first Model 39 was manufactured from 1954-1966. It has a steel frame and slide, but the barrel is fairly short, and it is a light weapon. Civilian versions have walnut grips; military versions (known as the Model 41, and not to be confused with the .22 Long Rifle-firing Model 41) have black plastic grips. From 1958-1959, the military version was also manufactured in a single-action version, and called the Model 44. All three have an adjustable rear sight, and all three are identical for game purposes. The Model 39-1 is also nearly identical, but has a light alloy frame. It was manufactured until 1971. The Model 39-2 is a Model 39-1 with a modified extractor for more reliable functioning, and it was manufactured until 1982. In 1968, Smith & Wesson started what was then a top-secret project: the Model M39-WOX-13A. (This is otherwise identical to the Model 39 for game purposes.) This weapon was designed for the US Marines, but some were given to the Navy, fitted with a silencer kit, modified for use with subsonic ammunition, and became the Mk22 Mod 0 "Hush Puppies" (elsewhere in these pages). The Model 439 began as simply a re-named Model 39-2, but it was later modified with an ambidextrous safety and squared trigger guard. The Model 539 is a Model 439 totally in steel, and is otherwise identical to the Model 39 for game purposes. The Model 639 was the long-awaited civilian stainless steel version; early models had a round trigger guard, but later versions had a squared trigger guard, and it was produced until 1988. ( I'am not the autor of this text) Luis Fernando |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Hi, Luis,
The S&W pistol program was not initiated because of the large number of pistols used in WWII, but in response to a request by the U.S. Army for proposals for a new pistol to replace the M1911A1. Carl Hellstrom didn't design the pistols, though he was in overall charge of the company and the design team that did. The Army ultimately decided that it had enough .45 pistols on hand that there was no need to adopt a new pistol at that time. (Of course, the 9mm Beretta M9 was adopted many years later, but that has no bearing on the S&W developments in the 1950's.) "Most" Model 39's are not made with a steel frame, phosphated or otherwise, they have an alloy frame. The steel frame Model 39 is quite rare as others have indicated. I have no idea what you mean by "game purposes." No one is discussing games, we are talking about real pistols. Also, I would be interested in your source for the information about a 9mm "Model 41". Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,Quebec CANADA
Posts: 173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
I said above that there is a lot of confusion about that whole group of S&W autos, but I would not depend on an auction site for accurate information. The Model 44 (so-called) is even more confusing. It really was the first to be announced, in 1954, and appeared in the 1955 Gun Digest. The cover has a picture of an engraved model. It has no model designation, and is described simply as the "S&W 9mm pistol". There were similar articles in the gun magazines at the time, all describing the single action model.
The DA model (later called the Model 39) was actually produced later. It shows signs in design of being the result of a "crash" program. The SA gun was made in only a small quantity (100 or less is the usual figure given), though it was cataloged. The clamor for the DA model apparently led S&W to drop the SA model and concentrate on the DA model. Even so, it was some time before any appeared. Mine is #5683 and was bought new in 1957. It has an alloy frame. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2
|
I also have a S&W mod 39. So you say that the long extractor spring will eventually break? Is there anything I could do to modify?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Those extractors did occasionally break, but they generally are quite reliable, so I wouldn't worry much about a particular one breaking. There is no feasible way to modify the original guns to use the new type extractor.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Great Desert
Posts: 154
|
The Mdl.39 9MM pistol was nothing more than a streamlined Walther P-38. In the history of the Mdl.39 S&W the S&W engineers based the Mdl.39 on the P-38.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|