|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#26 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Knoxville Tennessee
Contributor
Posts: 2,603
|
41 mag myself. No offence to the 45 but there just aint enough knock down power where it counts. Granted a double stack clip will allow you to throw morelead down range but I am more worried about a pissed off bear that a dead one. You have a better chance at a single shot kill with the 44 than that of the 45 auto. That being said I believe the 357 would offer a better range kill or chance of kill than the 45.
__________________
"You say the Devil made do it with a smile. Raisin' hell and howlin at the moon. Well I'm gonna put your @$$ back in line. I'm gonna scare the Devil out of you." BlackBerry Smoke Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R513dA4peMg Nothing is "proof" against a truly talented fool. ![]() ![]() ![]() Swanshot |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, West Virginia
Posts: 1,013
|
Another vote for the .44 magnum. My launch vehicle is a S&W 29 Mountain Gun (4" tapered barrel). A good companion to the Marlin 1894SS lever action rifle in the same caliber.
__________________
===== Daniel L. Hawes - 540 347 2430 - HTTP://www.VirginiaLegalDefense.com By the way, nothing I say on this website as "user" should be taken as either advertising for attorney services or legal advice. Everyone having a question regarding the application of law to the facts of their situation should seek the advice of an attorney competent in the subject matter of the issues presented and licensed to practice in the relevant state. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
|
I took down a black bear last year with a .357 magnum in eastern Washington. Took 3 shots to bring him down, 3 more to kill him. He was about 10-12 years old, 300 lbs. Tough son of a bitch but the .357 did the job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Western, Maine
Posts: 26
|
Unless you're going to use them to shoot youself as a last resort, I wouldn't carry either the 357 or 45, they'll just get you hurt. If you're going to shoot a bear with a handgun make sure it's big enought to do the job. At least a 41 Mag or 44 Mag............TD
__________________
Retired from 25 yrs in Law Enforcement |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35
|
Given the choice between a 1911 and a .357, I'd take the .357, with full metal jackets. As a matter of fact, those are my choices, and that is what I pack. I go with the full metal jackets because in the woods, there's no such thing as over-penetration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 247
|
what would be your opinion on a 6 inch barrel judge firing pretty hot .45 long colt loads? its the biggest caliber hand gun i have and thats what i take with me when im in the woods. ive been thinking about getting a 500 S&W
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 258
|
Ive been in grizz territory only once and for back up i wore both of my saa .45 colts both loaded with my 250 grain jhp's with unique powder behind them. 5 1/2 inch barrels and in a double hip rig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 89
|
I hunt bears with hounds, this is what i carry in with me. a Marlin 1895GS, 45-70. and a Ruger Super Blackhawk 44 mag. as a back up weapon.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: i live in southern indiana,old country boy at heart
Posts: 1,506
|
i would not choose either,a 44 mag would be the least i would go if i couldnt afford a 500 s&w mag.if you only have the two then if it is a ruger 45 reload or buy custom rounds to make up the difference,i wouldnt even consider the 357. old semperfi
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|