|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 20
|
I like the looks of the brass framed BP Remingtons. Should I be concerned about the durability of these brass frames? I'll only be shooting 2 or 3 cylinders of rounds about once a week. Thanks, Ken
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 290
|
I have the same question I am also looking at a brass frame Remington and the spiller and burr revolver myself and I have been wondering that the brass frame myself. I have read review on dixie gun works they give them pretty review
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19
|
I have a 12" pietta Remington with the brass frame (Cabellas sells them) and
have no "stretch" in the frame. I know this because I used a feeler guage between the cylinder and forcing cone when brand new(.004) and check it every season. I usually use 27 gr. of Pyrodex with a wonder wad and .454 ball. I have used 777 also with no ill effects. Stew |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,828
|
stewswanson, how much have you shot it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 20
|
Hey John, If I read his post correctly, he has shot it 777 times. I'm going to get a Remington 1858 with brass frame. I don't think I'll shoot it enough to hurt it and I really like the way they look. Also, Darryl Choy in his report, "Percussion Revolvers: A Primer" says, "Shooting a brass frame with mild loads should not be a problem" His recommendations for a .44 load is "20 to 30 grains of 3F and a .451 round ball" Ken
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19
|
I have proabably 500 rounds though it. The 777 I referred to is Hodgsons powder which is more powerful than Pyrodex or BP. Using BP or pyrodex and keeping it under 30 gr. should not overstress the frame IMHO.
Stew |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ok
Posts: 106
|
777, is a smokless type of blackpowder substitute. Or less smoke then the others.It is usually called triple 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 20
|
I'm new to BP so I did not recognize the 777 name. Sorry about that. Ken
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: i live in southern indiana,old country boy at heart
Posts: 1,506
|
sorry to disagree but 777 is not smokeless at all,what it is,is it has no sulfur to corrode the steel and it is by voluum 15% hotter than black powder or pyrodex.it is however a little harder to ignite so use hotter caps. old semperfi
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
|
The key to having and shooting a brass frame revolver is to use light loads of powder. Most of these guns say you can shoot a max of 30 grains of 3f of pyrodex p if you will stay on the light side of of the specs say about 22 to 25 grains of powder you should not really have any problems. It is my understanding that shooting a high load of powder over and over again will eventually stretch the frame, brass just isnt as strong as steel.
Good luck and have fun! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Contributor
Posts: 1,447
|
Quote:
You don't need to shoot maximum loads for recreational purposes - 25 gr is nothing to sneeze at; muzzle velocity should be in the neighborhood of 750-800 fps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 149
|
As long as you're not going to war with a brass frame, you shouldn't have any problems with it.
__________________
No matter what they say or do, I will never surrender my guns. ![]() Am I paranoid? Nope, I'm heavily armed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 754
|
But 100 years from now, your (or somebody's) great, great grandson is gonna wish it was steel and not worn out brass...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,863
|
Remember that the rimfire Henry cartridge and thus the first Winchester 66 ones then also were actually .44-25s...the quote from ofitq above that 25 grains is nothing to sneeze at is a good one. Granted there was no gas loss with the cartridges but it would be close.
Heck, I shoot 25 grains in my steel frame Traditions 1860 and it works goo enough. I'm not sure when i shoot conicals I could get much more in there! Heck the standard load for a Walker (or was it a Dragoon I forget?) was only 40 grains...think .44-40.
__________________
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: hurricane ally florida
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
this is what i have read and do not present myself as an authority. s.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,863
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,863
|
BTW, like most BP guns, revolvers shoot more accurately with a lighter charge, in my Son's brass frame CVA .36 1851 we only shoot roundballs over 15 grains of FFFg, and it shoots well.
Dixie calls for a load for their Brass frame Remington .44 not to exceed 22 grains.
__________________
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|