The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Technical Information > Technical Questions & Information

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2003, 10:54 PM   #1
CountryGunsmith
Advanced Senior Member
 
CountryGunsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Deep Piney Woods of East Texas
Posts: 5,116
Default Ruger 10/22 Short Barrels

Mesen
V.I.P. Member
Posts: 436
(2/1/02 11:31:05 am)
Reply | Edit | Del All Wouldn't this take a Class 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this barrel require any special registration I know putting on a gun would require some kind of registration
cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1800812146
IF YOU VALUE YOUR FREEDOM, THANK A VET!

AntiqueDr
Senior Chief Moderator Staff
Posts: 1931
(2/1/02 11:36:48 am)
Reply | Edit | Del
ezSupporter
Re: Wouldn't this take a Class 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The barrel in and of itself does not require any registration, as it is not a "firearm." Installing that barrel on a Ruger 10/22 creates a "short-barrelled rifle," which is an NFA classification and requires a $200 tax stamp, approval from ATF, yada yada.


We Buy Guns! 1 - 100, Antique or Modern!
www.apaxenterprises.com

LIKTOSHOOT
Senior Chief Moderator Staff
Posts: 3602
(2/1/02 11:58:00 am)
Reply | Edit | Del Re: Wouldn't this take a Class 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc`s right and that barrel appears to be threaded to accept a suppressor....."check your states laws before installing"
More like... "ALL NFA RULES APPLY!"

***EDITED FOR A SNIDE COMMENT***

If you have a 10/22 in the house, you better not have this barrel around, lest you like the word... PUMPED"

Edited by: LIKTOSHOOT at: 2/1/02 12:00:34 pm

Mesen
V.I.P. Member
Posts: 437
(2/1/02 12:02:41 pm)
Reply | Edit | Del Re: Wouldn't this take a Class 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the plethora of 10/22 take-off barrels available for next to nothing looks like someone could do ok shortening and threading them or would the production of the barrel fall under a different set of rules
IF YOU VALUE YOUR FREEDOM, THANK A VET!

AntiqueDr
Senior Chief Moderator Staff
Posts: 1932
(2/1/02 12:09:39 pm)
Reply | Edit | Del
ezSupporter
Re: Wouldn't this take a Class 3?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. The barrel itself is meaningless. It might as well be a piece of angle-iron as far at ATF is concerned UNTIL you install it on a receiver. And, like LTS said, the mere possession of the barrel AND a rifle the barrel will fit on MIGHT be a problem...

Now, there was a landmark ruling that went against ATF in favor of Thompson Center, where the court ruled that possession of a shoulder stock for a Contender was not illegal even if you also possessed barrels less than 16" long PROVIDED THAT you also had a barrel 16" long or longer. The court held that since there is a legal combination there, it was OK. That would not hold true for the 10/22 though, I merely raise the point for clarification.

The market for these barrels would be the Class 2 Manufacturer.
We Buy Guns! 1 - 100, Antique or Modern!
www.apaxenterprises.com

-->
CountryGunsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com