|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Contributor
Posts: 784
|
What's yalls opinion on the 1911s with the bull barrel and no barrel bushing vs. the regular 1911s with a barrel bushing? How's the accracy between the two?
__________________
Fear is only a word in the mind of the weak!
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,710
|
While a tight bushing on a standard barrel is a start at getting better accuracy out of a 1911, a loose fit of the slide to the frame and of the barrel to the slide will most certainly kill accuracy. A cheap addition to the barrel bush is the Wilson Combat Dwyer Group Gripper. Through a small spring in the recoil spring guide, and a notch in a special barrel link, the barrel is pushed up into the slide with enough force to make the barrel/slide return to exactly the same place with every shot. In my case it reduced my group sizes by about 30% (with the fitted barrel bush).
No amount of heavy barrel is going to make up for a loose slide to barrel fit and/or a loose slide to frame fit. But this is just my experience (and that of Jerry Kuhnhausen): http://www.amazon.com/Colt-45-automa...2316130&sr=1-1 LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
I prefer a precisely fit barrel bushing myself.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Contributor
Posts: 784
|
LD, I have that book and like it very much. I have a few 1911s and like them the way they are now, But I have seen some Kimbers without the barrel bushing and with a bull barrel. I was just asking for opinions to see what other people thought of the bull barrel. I have not shot the bull barrel and was just wondering about it and I know a lot of you have a lot more experiance than I on the defferance. I thank you for your response.
__________________
Fear is only a word in the mind of the weak! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 252
|
I have both types of 1911s. I can't tell that there is any difference in accuracy or function. I do prefer the bushing style, more traditional, I guess, and I find field stripping to be simpler. Regardless, I wouldn't pass up a great deal on a bull barrel 1911!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
|
The conical/bull barrel is supposed to help reduce muzzle flip; I have 1911s with both types of barrels and have yet to see any evidence of that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Florida
Contributor
Posts: 8,054
|
My colt defender is a bull barrel gun and for a 3" gun it is very accurate. I have been carrying my smith commander, but my colt has been calling my name some lately.
__________________
I own a bunch of scary guns. You want em? Come and take em..... Liberalism is a serious, non curable, mental disorder... NRA LIFE MEMBER Oath Keepers Member NRA Certified Instructor 30 Yr CC permit holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,710
|
Spooge:
Your impression is right. The physics of it says that the recoil force is above the wrist and that distance above the wrist creates a lever for the recoil to work on, causing the gun to rise. A sherical bushing can not make a difference in muzzle flip, in my opinion and that of science, as I understand it. LDBennett |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|