|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 216
|
My dad has a Rossi model 92 (copy of the old Winchester 92) that he is thinking about selling. It`s in .357 mag, 20 inch barrel. Bought new in the early 90s. Perfect condition, never fired.
What would be a fair price to ask?
__________________
Wisdom does not come with age. It`s just that as you get older you become physically less capable of acting stupid.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,885
|
The Puma and Rossi are nearly identical; around here in like new they're going in $400-425 ballpark. If you've got alot of CASS shooters in the area, then you may get a little more.
__________________
. What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens) "Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands." "I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press." ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 102
|
I bought a .44 mag Rossi model 92 brand new for $450 just a few months ago. I'd think that used would be a bit less than $400 unless the quality has changed since the '90s...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,662
|
400 is about right, and it's also a purty good profit. I bought my first one, in the late 90s, and paid 249, brand new.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 60
|
The last new one I saw for sale locally was $429. Same configuration, .357 in a blued, 20 inch round barrel. The octagonal barrels seem to run a little more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NRA LIFE MEMBER
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
The barrel length on mine is 16" and the gun weighs 4.8 pounds. Nice, light & fast for deer hunting out to 100 yards. Can't see lugging around an 8.5 pound piece of artillery with a 24" octagonal barrel chambered for a small pistol caliber. That'd be kinda stupid like having a puny 4 cylinder in a Lincoln Continental. If I'm going to lug 8.5 pounds of steel through the brush it's going to be chambered for .45-70 or .450 Marlin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,662
|
Different folks have different opinions.
I've got a 73 Winchester rifle, 24" octagonal barrel, that weighs in around 9 pounds, in 44/40. I see nothing stupid about it. Got two 92 rifles - one 24" round barrel in 32/20 and one 24" octagonal in 38/40. See nothing stupid about them either. Also got several 92 carbines. Much smaller, much lighter. Enjoy them also.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NRA LIFE MEMBER
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
At least my head doesn't. My shoulders vehemently disagree. These 3 score + 2 year old shoulders complain a lot "louder" after lugging a 9 pound gun through the tag alders all day as opposed to a < 6 pound gun. Those 24" barrels like to reach out and make friends with every branch and switch in the bush, especially the ones hanging heavy with rain, dew or snow much more so than the 16" or 20" barrels. Last edited by pricedo; 12-07-2011 at 05:10 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|