|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lompoc California
Posts: 542
|
I thought I'd report on my initial results using Hodgdon Superformance powder and the .243.
I am in a lead free area so I chose the Barnes 80 gr. TTSX. It's always been a good performer in the .243 and the 6mm/.244 Remington. The published load data rates a max load velocity at around 3,450 fps which is a good deal faster than any other powder I've used. I usually start just off published maximum with the Barnes as it seems to like being driven hard. Two three shot groups measured under 1/2" at 100 yards, but I have not chronographed the load yet. My 700 BDL is only 22" so I expect some velocity loss as a result. It's a ball powder so it measures well and near 100% load density. I used a Federal 210M primer and once-fired Federal brass. I loaded up 50 rounds and intend to try it on coyotes when we aren't chasing hogs. My point of impact was unchanged from my other load, which was a nice side benefit.
__________________
Life's too short to shoot an ugly gun.....
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,244
|
^^^ thanks for the report 410, you know i live in the buzzard zone as well and i shoot the 85 gr TSX in my .243 and my gun likes H4831sc... for their rifles bullets Barnes says you can load 1 grain over max for the same weight lead bullet because of the "rings" that are cut on the bearing surface of the bullet...
would you use the 80 gr Barnes for deer? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,630
|
Thanks for the info 410, never used Superformance yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 73
|
I just tried Superperformance last summer and I was pleased with the results. I also have a .243. Shoots good.
__________________
The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win – cheat if necessary. Two Glock 9mm's, Ruger LC9, Kimber Custom II .45ACP, Ruger 10/22, 12 ga. pump shotgun, and Rem .243 WIN. I reload all of my guns, except the shotgun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lompoc California
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
__________________
Life's too short to shoot an ugly gun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,280
|
I wouldnt hesitate to shoot deer with it. I have taken deer witht he .223 loaded with 53 gr TSXs here. Clean one shot kills. The Barnes bullets are fantastic at exponentially improving the terminal performance of the ammo.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,244
|
those are wimpy white tails, we got manly mule deer out here in the western mountains
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
is it more humane to take a deer with bow and arrow, or a 62 grain .223 Barnes bullet? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,280
|
Either will do it with equal humainity so long as the hunter possesses the skill. An arrow shaft thru the heart or a bullet thru the heart makes no difference.
Speakin of tough muleys.. Evan03 has posted pictures of dropped colorado muleys with the 53 gr TSX. Stu took his .300 tejas to Africa with 180 gr TSXs and dropped 2 cape buffalo. The Xs just work.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
Last edited by JLA; 12-12-2011 at 10:20 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 271
|
410, have you ever tried the, hornady 100gr. Sp. with SuperFormance? I want to try it but looking for info before I buy something that might be unsuitable for my .243. Not that I'm cheap but I'm on a fixed income. Thanks for any info you can give.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lompoc California
Posts: 542
|
That is exactly the conclusion we've had shooting the Barnes out here. Our primary quarry is hogs and there isn't anything tougher on a bullet. I tell people that it basically up's the caliber one step in terminal performance. Go lighter and faster 'cause that's what the bullet wants.
__________________
Life's too short to shoot an ugly gun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lompoc California
Posts: 542
|
Go to the Hodgdon powder website and look up loads for the .243 to see if there's data on Superformance. I don't recall seeing anything for heavier than about 80 grains. I have to shoot copper out here so have not played with any cup-and-core bullets.
__________________
Life's too short to shoot an ugly gun..... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|