The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearm-related Activities > The Ammo & Reloading Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2011, 11:14 AM   #1
dbach
V.I.P. Member
 
dbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Trinity, TX
Posts: 166
Default Universal vs Titegroup?

I ordered some Hodgdon Universal powder from the local gun shop. They dropped the ball and misplaced the order ... it was never placed. when I went to pick up the other powder I had ordered they apologised and asked to substitute Titegroup. They keep Titegroup in stock, not Universal. The Titegroup was about $10.00 less than the Universal so I figured they had accidently done me a favor.

Are the two compariable? Do they perform about the same? I shoot mostly .38, .40S&W and 45 ACP.
__________________
David Bachelder
Trinity, TX
Rookie Reloader but learning fast
9mm, 40S&W, 45ACP, 45 Colt, 38 Special, .357 Magnum, 38 S&W, .243, & 30-06
CHL ~ Texas

-->
dbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 11:34 AM   #2
garydude
Senior Member
 
garydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Desert Southwest Proper
Contributor
Posts: 742
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

I don't think they did you any favor. The universal has about the same burn rate as unique, but from what I understand, it meters much better. It's a very good powder for mid-range+ loads for the calibers you list. Titegroup will also work well for the calibers listed, but more for target, lighter loads to mid-range at best. Here's a link to the burn rates chart- http://www.hodgdon.com/burn-rate.html
garydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 11:47 AM   #3
Alpo
Advanced Senior Member
 
Alpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,658
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

I don't know about that "light to mid-range" thing. The only thing I use titegroup in is full-bore 38/40s and full-bore 44 Russians. My 6.4 of Tite under a 180 in the 38/40 gives the performance of 8.0 of Unique (990 fps)

But doing some comparisons of max loads, on Hodgdon's webpage:

38 special, 158 lead SWC. 4.5 of Universal, 974 fps. 3.8 of Titegroup, 920 fps.

40 S&W, 180 Hornady XTP. 5.8 of Universal, 1046 fps. 4.7 of Titegroup, 978 fps.

45 ACP, 230 FMJ FP. 5.6 of Universal, 844 fps. 4.8 of Titegroup, 818 fps.

So, yeah, you can't push 'em quite as fast, but those don't look like wussy mid-range loads to me.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297

I always take precautions.

Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.


Last edited by Alpo; 12-16-2011 at 11:50 AM..
Alpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 03:54 PM   #4
JLA
*TFF Moderator/Host*
 
JLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

I like TG. It is an efficient form of Unique in that it can be loaded in just about any handgun round from the teeny .25ACP to the .45 colt. And its clean burning. My all time fav and most accurate .45ACP load is with 5.8 gr TG under a 200 gr Dardas RN sized .452"
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do.

Fact of life:
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!


JLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 04:40 PM   #5
bobpayne44
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbach View Post
The Titegroup was about $10.00 less than the Universal so I figured they had accidently done me a favor.
its all within about 50 cents difference where i buy my powder i average about $18 a pound for any i buy.
bobpayne44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 05:15 PM   #6
dbach
V.I.P. Member
 
dbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Trinity, TX
Posts: 166
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobpayne44 View Post
its all within about 50 cents difference where i buy my powder i average about $18 a pound for any i buy.
Powder here averages about 25.00 to 35.00 a pound. The Titegroup was 20.00.
__________________
David Bachelder
Trinity, TX
Rookie Reloader but learning fast
9mm, 40S&W, 45ACP, 45 Colt, 38 Special, .357 Magnum, 38 S&W, .243, & 30-06
CHL ~ Texas
dbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 06:12 PM   #7
JLA
*TFF Moderator/Host*
 
JLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

18 to 26 a pound round here, depending on type and brand, and trailboss is about 11 bucks a can, but its only 9 ounces.. dang theyre gouging yall poor folk round the coast..
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze.

The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do.

Fact of life:
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!


JLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 06:29 PM   #8
gun-nut
Senior Member
 
gun-nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ohio
Contributor
Posts: 931
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLA View Post
18 to 26 a pound round here, depending on type and brand, and trailboss is about 11 bucks a can, but its only 9 ounces.. dang theyre gouging yall poor folk round the coast..
Thats just about the same i pay.
__________________
Don't retreat just reload.
gun-nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 06:48 PM   #9
garydude
Senior Member
 
garydude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Desert Southwest Proper
Contributor
Posts: 742
Default Re: Universal vs Titegroup?

Dbach,
Let me clarify my earlier statements a tad more. Titegroup is a great powder and I cannot in any way criticize its performance. I've used it to very good effect in the 38, 45acp and 500 loads. It has performed flawlessly in all. My biggest issues are that it is super dense and will give very little case fill, and it has very little margin for error in it's use. It truly requires diligence in loading that you are certain you do not double charge any load. I find it more difficult to visually inspect the charged cases because it barely fills them.

BUT on the plus side it meters well and is very economical. It's amongst the cleanest powders I have tried.

To be sure you didn't waste any money. It really is a great powder, but for the top performance of your calibers other powders would be more appropriate.

Last edited by garydude; 12-16-2011 at 06:58 PM..
garydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com