|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Miss.
Posts: 21
|
a friend told me i didnt need to run a brush with copper remover on it through my rifle to clean it. said to just run a few patches through it and it would be fine. ive always run a brush through it and then patches till they come out clean...... so what do you do?
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,888
|
If you see any greenish blue when you run the copper solvent, it's a clear indicator that you need to keep cleaning. I'd take your friends gun and run some copper solvent in it; if it comes out dirty, you can inform him that copper fouling is not beneficial to accuracy. I don't clean extensively after every outing, if it's only a few shots, then a couple of patches and some butch's boreshine is all it takes for me.
__________________
. What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens) "Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands." "I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press." ![]() . Last edited by woolleyworm; 03-23-2012 at 09:26 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: naugatuck,Ct.
Contributor
Posts: 6,686
|
i run a bore snake then patches and oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,107
|
I don't use a brush every time, it depends on the outing. I was taught to never run a brush down the barrel first. I always start with a patch dipped in solvent, followed by a clean patch every time I go down the barrel untill they come out dry and clean. Dont use to much solvent, only what the patch will absorbe, it should not be dripping. To much solvent can drip into the trigger mechanism and gum it up. I run the rod through from the chamber end, because if you run from the muzzzle end you will deposit dirt into the chamber or receiver, which should be relatively clean. I also take care to make sure the tip and rod are centered and do not touch the barrel, because it will scratch it.
__________________
There is no such thing as a gun accident. Irresponsible gun owners cause so-called gun accidents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,754
|
Questions on how to clean a gun will get you a hundred different response. I have known competitors that NEVER clean their gun and those that clean them after every few shots (bench rest shooters). Question about which rod to use or rod ends or patches or solvents will also get you lots of opinion. Some prefer the pull through OTIS system, or the patch worm.
As for using a brush or not Volquartsen says never while other manufacturers say do it, just not a hard brush like a stainless steel brush. There are many different solvents: good old Hoppe's #9, copper solvents, water based soap solvents, combination CLP (clean, lubricate, protect) liquids, ammonia based solvents, a foam solvent, and on and on. There is even a reverse electro-chemical tool you can use. When you try to get info from manufacturers you get the same variety of answers. So what to do? Find a method that works for you, is easy, something you will do regularly, and do it often, as once you start piling on powder residue and cover it with copper over and over, it is very difficult to remove. Does cleaning effect accuracy.? Sometimes if the barrel gets too fouled but I have some ex-mIlitary guns whose barrels look doubtful that shoot very well. So who really knows? I clean after every shooting session. I use all of the common solvents for various guns. I use the pull through OTIS system on my 22's and I never use a brush in my Volquartsen barrel (as per their directions). But at some point in the cleaning of a tough barrel, I give up and pronounce it good enough. Some barrels clean easily. Some require coper solvents (rifle cartridges). but I do use a brush on every gun except my Volquartsen 22 barrel. But hey, that's just what I do. Others have their regime. LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 208
|
I have been shooting auto pistols, not rifles lately but it should be similar.
I start with a patch wet with EEZOX and run it through the barrel from chamber to muzzle. I have a large set of TIPTON jags and bronze brushes so I have a choice for a snug fit. The jags are those round things that push the patch through, not the ones you have to fold and thread the patch through a slot on the end. This gives a firm fit all around. After the first pass I pull the rod back out without the patch then reverse the patch and push the clean(er) side through. Then I switch to a bronze brush, wet it with EEZOX and do a few back-and-forths. I then repeat the patch routine with a new patch. This seems to be very effective. The bore is shiny and slick. The EEZOX is rated as a solvent, lubricant and rust preventive so I leave the barrel alone after the above procedure and give the rest of the gun some attention. Use whatever products you like but a gun that gets regular attention should not be a bear to clean with any of the stuff on the market today. I would also opine that a gun that has had a bit of firing done should be easier to clean. The slugs blasting down the barrel will have a wearing effect on the machining marks left by the manufacturing process and smooth the barrel over time and leave fewer microscopic protrusions to rip off jacket material. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Little hut in the woods near Blue River Wisconsin
Posts: 2,320
|
Barrel is steel, brush is copper, carbon and lead are softer than the steel. Go ahead and brush.
__________________
"When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil."~~- Thomas Jefferson Roman Catholic, Life Member of American Legion, VFW, Wisconsin Libertarian party, Wi-FORCE, WGO, NRA, JPFO, GOA, SAFand CCRKBA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,489
|
Another thing that hasn't been mentioned yet.
If you're using a brush with a copper remover, use a nylon one. Otherwise, things will look "blue" forever as the copper remover dissolves the brush just like it does the copper fouling. Most copper fouling solvents state this right on the label too. A copper solvent is a very aggresive chemical solvent and no brushing is needed for general use. So... When using copper remover, use nylon or no brush. Using standard bore solvent...go ahead and brush as much as needed to clean the powder & lead fouling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,754
|
A couple of things:
Volquartsen says NO brushing or the warrantee is void. They claim (with a bore scope??) they can see which barrels have been brushed and those that have not (??). While steel is harder than the bronze of the brush Volquartsen claims it still see marks the bore. What happens to bores that are not clean properly is you get alternating layers of fouling and copper. Once the layer of copper is removed it exposes a layer of fouling that the solvent does not always easily remove. The instructions that come with the electro-chemica reverse plating system has you go through alternate cycle of electrically removing the coper layer then using brushing and patch techniques to remove the fouling. If the bore is bad enough the process can become endless. Finally, a poorly cared for bore can have copious amounts of copper and powder fowling in it such that patches may never come out totally clean. Old military barrels are prime examples. Some of those shoot as well as they are able with some cleaning. Their bores are so rough that the fouling and copper builds up quickly even though you spent hours and hours trying to remove it all. The cleaning effort was almost a waste of time and effort. LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 872
|
Each of my rifles get a different cleaning method, it all depends on the type of bullet it shoots, and the amount of copper fouling it accumulates.
My 22 gets a bronze brush soaked in penetrating oil; then a clean patch till relatively clean, then I swipe it with a 10w40 oiled patch to resist rust. I'll run a clean patch to remove the oil before firing. My Win 30-30 doesn't copper foul, so I'll clean just like the 22 above. My Howa 30-06 doesn't copper foul too much so I'll clean just like the 2 above then when I get enough copper to worry about, I'll clean for copper fouling.... I'll take a mop and dip it in my ammonia based copper cleaning solvent, (I have a small jar/bottle of it,) and run it down my bore, I'll usually do that 4 times then wait 5 to 10 minutes. Then run a clean patch down it. That usually gets it all out, then I'll clean for carbon fouling again, then add the 10w40 oil. My other rifles that copper foul more will get a few more episodes of copper cleaning, which I'll stop when the clean patch comes out light blue. I used to be like your friend, I only used patches for about 20 or so years, and developed a carbon ring in my bore near the throat. This pic shows where it used to be after a marathon cleaning with a bronze bore brush. ![]() It looks a lot better now that I've changed my cleaning regiment. ![]()
__________________
Debate isn't "uncivil" behavior. Pointing out illogical reasoning is a legitimate counter argument. That is the problem with internet forum mods, they rarely understand what constitutes legitimate, honest and civil debate. They reward the trolls and annoy the people genuinely trying communicate. I don't really like this place anyway, have fun with your power trip. ![]() ...nuff said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AridZona
Posts: 171
|
I have often wondered why the T-handle of a cleaning rod doesn't imply it is designed to to pull a brush from breech to muzzle in a bolt-action rifle.
What I mean is after removing the bolt from the breech, run the rod down the muzzle to the breech without the brush, screw on the brush on from the breech, and pull the brush through (rather than scrub back and forth). Of course it is simple and easy to push a pad through directly from the breech out the muzzle but a brush is much harder to "push" from breech than pull from the muzzle. Am I missing some action that risks wearing the crown at the muzzle by doing it this way? Thanks for sharing your wisdom and experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
__________________
If you ain't 1st, you're (per ALPO) last (Ricky Bobby) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|