|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
|
-->
Last edited by shugy; 06-10-2012 at 12:57 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,099
|
Welcome.
Suggest that you post some detailed pictures; especially of any markings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,410
|
Pics indeed. Mauser made many pistols between 1880 and 1940, the most prevalent of which was the C96 broomhandle
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
|
heres some pics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,772
|
Appears to be a 1906 FN 32, except that the FN had a straight backstrap and that one is curved.
Looks nothing like any Mauser I've seen. Stamped all over that gun are Belgian proofs. Next to the word MAUSER that LEG in an oval is the proof for Liege Belgium. Those tower-looking things next to it are the Perron. Also Belgian. http://damascus-barrels.com/Belgian_All_Proofmarks.html With an obvious Belgian gun marked Mauser, I'm kinda thinking "Chinese copy". Or somebody stamped it MAUSER because "everyone knows" that Belgian guns are crap while Mausers are great guns. Done to make it easier to sell.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,504
|
All the markings are crudely hand engraved, I agree with Alpo, either Chinese or Khyber Pass. I opp for the second, every thing about the gun looks crude.
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
|
Thanks alpo, most info i've seen yet, is it safe to fire?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,099
|
I would advise one NOT TO FIRE IT. I do not think anyone here can know if it is safe to fire, or not.
The India/Pakistan or China hand-made copies of well known British and European guns are metallurgical unknowns. They are almost never heat-treated or properly proofed. In a low pressure caliber like .32 ACP, you may never have a problem; or you may get injured. Getting hurt is not good. Therefore, on a risk vs benefit basis; I advise not to load and fire it for fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5
|
Thanks to all, what a great site! maybe it will make a nice bookend!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
"Mauser made many pistols between 1880 and 1940..."
Yep, but that is not one of them. I agree that it is probably Chinese or Khyber pass origin. Just FWIW, no Mauser-made pistol would have Belgian proofs, even if it were sold in Belgium, since Belgium recognized German proof. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,410
|
ill agree something looks fishy. take to a gunsmith and have him check it for safe operation. Dont fire it until its deemed safe.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|