The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearms > Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2005, 06:32 PM   #1
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

I bought my wife a S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight in .38 Spl. for personal protection. Personally, I like the gun. It's light as a feather, but as a consequence, kicks like a mule... well, relatively speaking... Anyway, my wife has trouble with it hurting the web of her hand, and I was wondering if there were any aftermarket grips that cover the back of the gun better, with a softer grip?... Yeah, I know, this is not something a guy would normally ask, however my wife has VERY small hands (size 4 ring finger, small) and I don't want her to be scared of the gun...

Any ideas?...

-->

Last edited by ponycar17; 03-14-2005 at 06:47 PM..
ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 06:50 PM   #2
inplanotx
Advanced Senior Member
 
inplanotx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,897
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Pachmyer?
__________________
inplanotx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 06:56 PM   #3
Shooter45
*Administrator*
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Contributor
Posts: 8,753
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Also check out Hogue Grips.
Shooter45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 07:14 PM   #4
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Thanks for the responses. I'm looking at the Pachmayr decelerator grip... Yeah, I'm kinda dumb in the area of grips. I've never had a desire to upgrade the grips on one of my few handguns... This upgrade comes more out of necessity than sport...
ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 10:17 PM   #5
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

I finally got the Pachmayr grip in that I ordered. It's their "Decelerator" grip. I think it feels great in "my" hand, but it's huge. It adds an additional finger groove that the factory Uncle Mike's grip doesn't have, as evidenced in the pic below. This kind of turns me off because it's supposed to be a light, easily-concealable pistol, right?... Oh well...



The good news is that the new grip greatly improved "my" accuracy with the gun. With the small grip, I couldn't hit a thing hardly. Here's a target from 10 yards that I used today. I know, I should've used a pistol target, but this is all I had on hand...



The wife shot it 5 times... She hit the target once (one of the stray shots above the bullseye). Most other rounds went in a box that was holding the target. The bad thing is, she says that this grip hurts WORSE!!!... I don't get it, but she's right. It actually left a large red mark on the web of her hand.

So what's a man to do?... Are there any better grips, or should I start looking for a .32 for her?...

ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 11:46 PM   #6
SouthernMoss
*Admin Tech Staff*
 
SouthernMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW MS
Contributor
Posts: 10,651
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Ponycar, I see that the revolver is DAO. How hard is the trigger pull on it? I have very small hands too, and have a DAO Charter 2000 Undercover .38spl. The 10lb+ trigger pull is murder on my small hands. When I grip the handle properly, I don't have enough finger on the trigger for proper leverage with such a heavy pull. And if I adjust my hand to have enough leverage on the trigger, then I don't have a proper grip on the handle. If this is the case with your wife, then the larger Pachmayer grip will make the problem worse, not better.

When I got my Springfield Armory Ultra Compact .45, I had to change out the Hogue grips that came with it for slimmer walnut grips. Made all the difference in the world. And the lighter SA trigger pull means I don't have to manhandle the thing to make it shoot.

As far a recoil, that's the price you pay for a lighter gun. And revolvers have more recoil than pistols, at least in my experience. I'll take my Ultra Compact or Marlin's (my husband, not the gun mfgr) Browning Hi-Power (in 9mm) any day of the week over my Charter 2000 revolver. But that's just me.

If your wife is comfortable enough with guns to work the slide on a pistol, you might want to consider one of the polymers. If not, then try to find a revolver with a lighter trigger pull, preferably one that can be shoot both SA and DA.

Disclaimer: not the advice of an expert, just the ramblings of a small-handed woman.
__________________


My Second protects your First


"I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man,
but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." - Susan B Anthony
SouthernMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2005, 07:42 PM   #7
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernMoss
Ponycar, I see that the revolver is DAO. How hard is the trigger pull on it? I have very small hands too, and have a DAO Charter 2000 Undercover .38spl. The 10lb+ trigger pull is murder on my small hands. When I grip the handle properly, I don't have enough finger on the trigger for proper leverage with such a heavy pull. And if I adjust my hand to have enough leverage on the trigger, then I don't have a proper grip on the handle. If this is the case with your wife, then the larger Pachmayer grip will make the problem worse, not better.
I'm not sure on the trigger pull of the 642. I know it's rather heavy, so you may be onto something. I know it takes practice to be able to hold your target, given a hefty trigger pull. I think you're right. The small hands thing, combined with DAO in a revolver probably aren't helping much at all in the way of accuracy. I think she shot better with the smaller grips, but I'm still not understanding the recoil consideration, with the larger grip being worse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernMoss
As far a recoil, that's the price you pay for a lighter gun. And revolvers have more recoil than pistols, at least in my experience. I'll take my Ultra Compact or Marlin's (my husband, not the gun mfgr) Browning Hi-Power (in 9mm) any day of the week over my Charter 2000 revolver. But that's just me.
Hehe, I warned her about the weight versus recoil when she chose that gun... Maybe I get a new 642 out of this unfortunate set of circumstances?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernMoss
If your wife is comfortable enough with guns to work the slide on a pistol, you might want to consider one of the polymers. If not, then try to find a revolver with a lighter trigger pull, preferably one that can be shoot both SA and DA.

Disclaimer: not the advice of an expert, just the ramblings of a small-handed woman.
Yes, she's profficient enough to use the slide. At first, she had some trouble using the slide of my Bersa .380, and that's why I swayed her toward a revolver. I guess it's just something that she can get used to... I have been looking at the Keltec P3AT in .380 as a possibility for her, and its trigger pull looks like its in the neighborhood of 5 lbs. so that should be a very good change. I guess I'll just have to drag her to the next gun show to see what we'll pick out.

Thanks for the advice, especially coming from another "small-handed woman"...

It's hard for me to understand her problems, but coming from someone who's into firearms, and in a similar situation really helps...

ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2005, 07:55 PM   #8
Marlin
*TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*
 
Marlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At SouthernMoss' side forever!
Contributor
Posts: 13,853
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

We had been looking more than year, she before we were married and both after, and it wasn't until she picked up the SA Ultra Compact that she immediately felt that was the gun for her. Nothing had really satisfied her 'til then except a Colt Mustang 380 in excellent condition. She wanted a larger calibre, though, and this one not only "fit" but it was larger!!!! SoMo had to have it and her trials were over, almost instantly.

You might find, if you can get her to look long enough at enough guns, that she, too, will one day find the "perfect" gun surprisingly out of the blue. It was worth the wait as there is no haunting doubt of any kind.
__________________


The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing.

The only criminal class native to the United States is Congress.
Marlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2005, 10:11 PM   #9
SouthernMoss
*Admin Tech Staff*
 
SouthernMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW MS
Contributor
Posts: 10,651
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponycar17
I'm still not understanding the recoil consideration, with the larger grip being worse.
If the grip is so large that she can't get her hand around it properly, the gun is going to move within her hand, rather than her hand and the gun moving as a single unit.

Try this with the larger grip:

Make sure the gun is unloaded, then hold the gun in your own hand and notice how far around the grip your fingers come and how far your thumb comes around in the other direction. Notice where the finger indentions of the grip meet your hand (I'm guessing it's pretty close to where your fingers join your palm.) Hold the gun in a nice, firm grip, and try to wiggle it sharply with your other hand.

Now have your wife hold the gun and notice the positioning of her fingers as compared to yours. I'm guessing that there's little overlap of thumb over fingers. I'm also guessing that the finger indentions on the larger grip hit around her first knuckle. Have her grip the gun firmly, then try to wiggle it sharply. See the difference?
__________________


My Second protects your First


"I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man,
but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." - Susan B Anthony
SouthernMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2005, 10:49 PM   #10
stash247
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,815
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

If you are so inclined, buy a Wolf, or Uncle Mike's, spring kit. Clean up the rebound slide , the trigger, and D.A. sear, with an arkansas stone, and install the lightest of the springs in the kit; if there is no spring for the rebound slide, cut 1 1/2 coils from the original, lube everything, and re-assemble. A double action J frame Smith can run just fine with 9# or less effort, at 100% reliability; some will run reliably, below 7 #.
Put the skinny grips back on, and look at the targets!
__________________
Don't start no s**t and there won't be none, Terry
stash247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 09:37 PM   #11
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

stash247, I bought a Wilson Combat spring kit, with an 8# hammer spring, and 3 different rebound springs (13#,14#, and 15#). I'm going to try it out, and see how it helps. I know I can't help her with the recoil problem, but I don't think that's an issue for self defense.

Thanks
ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2005, 03:30 AM   #12
badge851
Member
 
badge851's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 3
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Not trying to be a SMARTA$$ but it appears to me you got the wrong Pachmayr® grips. Send them back & get the Compac Pachmayr® grips. More compact/concealable and cushion the recoil really well. They are the grips my wife uses on her snubby 38.
__________________
DAVID
[x]No Guns, [x]No Rights, [x]No Future, [x]NoWay

Last edited by badge851; 05-08-2005 at 03:32 AM..
badge851 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2005, 08:58 PM   #13
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by badge851
Not trying to be a SMARTA$$ but it appears to me you got the wrong Pachmayr® grips. Send them back & get the Compac Pachmayr® grips. More compact/concealable and cushion the recoil really well. They are the grips my wife uses on her snubby 38.
The "Compac" Pachmayr grips have one less finger grip than the "Decelerator" has. The extra finger grip of the "Decelerator" moves the center of rotation of the gun downward, and therefore decreases the pressure on the webbing of your hand caused by the recoil. The "Compac" grip has the same number of finger grooves as the factory grip, and therefore the same point of rotation under fire. The only advantage to the "Compac" grip is the softer rubber... I thought the "Compac" was a "compromise" to comfortable shooting, while maintaining concealability, but maybe my assumption was wrong. Is the "Compac" grip slimmer than the "Decelerator?" Am I misunderstanding the difference between the two grips?

The reduced hammer spring and rebound spring helped greatly with her accuracy. She still claims the recoil is painful, but to understand that, you must understand my wife... She's 5'0", 90 lbs., size 4 ring finger... yes, tiny... I did buy a Kel-Tec P3AT .380 yesterday as my toy, and she can't manage to pull the slide back on it; yes, no joke, I don't understand it either... So yeah, she doesn't deal well with harsh recoil and doesn't have the strength to reliably operate the slide on an auto pistol. Hopefully, she can shoot well enough to defend herself if the need arises. I'm working on her grip to assure that she's holding the 642 Smith as high as possible, to reduce the perceived recoil as much as possible.

The 642 compared to the P3AT in size, with a Bersa .380 and Ruger 22/45 alongside them for comparison... I like the P3AT!!! The wife doesn't... Good!!


Last edited by ponycar17; 05-09-2005 at 08:44 PM..
ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 07:12 PM   #14
badge851
Member
 
badge851's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 3
Lightbulb Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponycar17
The "Compac" Pachmayr grips have one less finger grip than the "Decelerator" has. The extra finger grip of the "Decelerator" moves the center of rotation of the gun downward, and therefore decreases the pressure on the webbing of your hand caused by the recoil. The "Compac" grip has the same number of finger grooves as the factory grip, and therefore the same point of rotation under fire. The only advantage to the "Compac" grip is the softer rubber... I thought the "Compac" was a "compromise" to comfortable shooting, while maintaining concealability, but maybe my assumption was wrong. Is the "Compac" grip slimmer than the "Decelerator?" Am I misunderstanding the difference between the two grips?
The reduced hammer spring and rebound spring helped greatly with her accuracy. She still claims the recoil is painful, but to understand that, you must understand my wife... She's 5'0", 90 lbs., size 4 ring finger... yes, tiny... I did buy a Kel-Tec P3AT .380 yesterday as my toy, and she can't manage to pull the slide back on it; yes, no joke, I don't understand it either... So yeah, she doesn't deal well with harsh recoil and doesn't have the strength to reliably operate the slide on an auto pistol. Hopefully, she can shoot well enough to defend herself if the need arises. I'm working on her grip to assure that she's holding the 642 Smith as high as possible, to reduce the perceived recoil as much as possible.

The 642 compared to the P3AT in size, with a Bersa .380 and Ruger 22/45 alongside them for comparison... I like the P3AT!!! The wife doesn't... Good!!
The grips I'm talking about are the Pachmayr® Presentation/Compac, with US Patent No. 3,672,084. They are not shown on the Pachmayr® website but still made.It's the same grip that Colt® used on their Detective Special. Has a special groove just for the pinky finger.
I'm new to this board & haven't "FINGERED OUT" photo uploads yet. If you send me an email to pcspatrol@comcast.net I'll send you a photo.
__________________
DAVID
[x]No Guns, [x]No Rights, [x]No Future, [x]NoWay
badge851 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2005, 09:46 PM   #15
stash247
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,815
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

I can buy 148 wads for $55/case. They punch a full caliber hole, just slower. Since, in most cases, blood loss is a more than significant factor, in gunshot wounds, perhaps you ought to start with these. They will not, cannot, HURT your petite wife, and won't scare her, either,as they, compared to the stuff you've been running, are very mild.
In a 2" gun, we already are making several compromises; simply, make one more, for a while, and let her grow into the gun!
My two daughters shoot, and very competitively, but both started with low recoiling rimfire rifles; they would likely wax my a**, today, over the course. The bigger girl weighs 106 #.
Your wife is new to the game; treat her gently. When she's ready to move up, both of you will Know. Meantime, reduce/eliminate recoil/muzzle blast, and she will continue to shoot. Set her up with YOUR weapon/load combo, she may not! Just my .02. Terry
__________________
Don't start no s**t and there won't be none, Terry
stash247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2005, 08:15 PM   #16
ponycar17
Advanced Senior Member
 
ponycar17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Carolina
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by stash247
They will not, cannot, HURT your petite wife, and won't scare her, either,as they, compared to the stuff you've been running, are very mild....
Your wife is new to the game; treat her gently. When she's ready to move up, both of you will Know. Meantime, reduce/eliminate recoil/muzzle blast, and she will continue to shoot. Set her up with YOUR weapon/load combo, she may not! Just my .02. Terry
Good advice overall... The only problem is that she's only shooting 130 gr. FMJ Winchester (Walmart Special) target ammo when she's complaining of the recoil pain. Keep in mind, this is a 16 oz. gun with a 1-7/8" barell. The girl who sold us the gun owned one herself. She complained that 10 rounds caused her hands to hurt as well... I got the email from badge (thanks badge), and I'm going to look into the Compac grip, as it looks like the factory Uncle Mike's grip, but only with a backstrap and softer rubber...
ponycar17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2005, 09:13 AM   #17
badge851
Member
 
badge851's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 3
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponycar17
Good advice overall... The only problem is that she's only shooting 130 gr. FMJ Winchester (Walmart Special) target ammo when she's complaining of the recoil pain. Keep in mind, this is a 16 oz. gun with a 1-7/8" barell. The girl who sold us the gun owned one herself. She complained that 10 rounds caused her hands to hurt as well... I got the email from badge (thanks badge), and I'm going to look into the Compac grip, as it looks like the factory Uncle Mike's grip, but only with a backstrap and softer rubber...
It's been my experience that Ladies like light (Airweight®) guns; UNTIL THEY SHOOT THEM! My wife wanted an Airweight® until she shot mine & the recoil was too much. Her gun is a 21oz Steel Frame and she does well with it. Another thing that helps to reduce perceived recoil is increased hearing protection. When my wife shoots with me @ the indoor police range she wears foam ear plugs AND EAR MUFFS. Now she has no problem. Give it a try.
__________________
DAVID
[x]No Guns, [x]No Rights, [x]No Future, [x]NoWay
badge851 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2005, 08:22 AM   #18
Vom Kriege
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

I recently bought a 642. I resisted buying a 5-shooter for a long time, but I have been very pleased with it. My wife likes the feel of it, but I suspect that the recoil would be a bit much for her. The Ruger SP101 we rented for her at the range did just fine for her, and I'll probably pick one up for here as soon as I can.

I found in my shooting of the 642 that the lighter weight bullets were easier to handle in it. I'm shooting 110 grainers in mine.

I have tried Pachmayrs on my S&W revolvers and did not like them. The Hogue grips are much more to my liking. You may want to try a set of Hogue Bantam grips.
Vom Kriege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2005, 10:32 AM   #19
45Smashemflat
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,494
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

FWIW - I've got a Ti Smith, double, super, extra light, so to speak. I've got Hogue laminated grips on it. Finger grooves, but no pinky ledge. Smooth, no checkering.

With full power loads, it pops pretty good, but the grip fits my hand well. You might look into a set of these, as they leave the back strap exposed. Sometimes a better fitting grip controls recoil better than a cushioned grip like the Pach's. These are pretty small and may allow your wife to achieve a more controlled pull and better fit grip on the gun.

I second Terry's suggestion with the wad cutters - slow and fat gets the job done with a 38 snub...
45Smashemflat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2005, 06:40 PM   #20
Laserlips
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 72
Default Re: S&W 642 J-Frame Airweight Aftermarket Grips

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponycar17

I did buy a Kel-Tec P3AT .380 yesterday as my toy, and she can't manage to pull the slide back on it

The 642 compared to the P3AT in size, with a Bersa .380 and Ruger 22/45 alongside them for comparison... I like the P3AT!!! The wife doesn't... Good!!

You might consider the P32 for your wife. It is my opinion that the P32's tend to be reliable more often right out of the box than the P3AT. The P32's have less recoil, one more round, slide lock. Mine has been 100% reliable and very accurate, at self defense range. I have a problem with hand strength, and KelTec Cust. Service recommended the P32 over the P3AT for me. You keep the 380, she'll be very happy with the 32.. Trust me.

If you ever decide to go up-caliber, take a look at the Bersa Thunder 9 (mini-compact.) I love mine, 13rd factory mags are to be sold in the US next year, and CAT has a great model specific laser for it. Excellent firearm in the tradition of the Bersa 380 you already own, and price is right. ($305.00)

Just a thought.

Best Wishes.
JP
__________________
"Laus Deo"
Laserlips is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com