|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
I have a 1870 Tower Musket that is 69 cal. smoothbore unlike Hawke`s it is a 3 band and it has a fixed rear sight, all that is on the lock plate is the crown at the rear and Tower over 1870 just ahead of the hammer, on the trigger guard there is an arrow pointing up with WD then a crown with E under it then an 18 on the bottom, these are in a vertical line, this appears again on the butt plate, R crown M Enfield, broad arrow over 1 in a circle is stamped on the right rear of the stock,there is an 'S' stamped on the barrel opposit the lock ,the gun has been lighty cleaned , any ideas on this?
-->
Last edited by Hos; 06-10-2012 at 03:16 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
We're going to need some pictures on this one. It sounds like a standard Brit military musket except that, as far as I know, they weren't making any .69 caliber smoothbores in 1870. Possibly you have something put together from parts...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,559
|
Probably had the rifling bored out to use as a shotgun. Many rifled muskets were done that way after the C.W. and more than a few had the stocks cut down also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
dup..
Last edited by deadin; 06-10-2012 at 02:13 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
Were the Brits still making percussion muskets in 1870??
Maybe for civilian trade to Africa or somewhere but this one sounds like it has military property marks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Hint: The British weren't making any muzzle loading muskets by 1870.
But the Japanese, and others, were making "Tower" muskets in the 1980's, marked "1870". Jim Last edited by Jim K; 06-10-2012 at 02:14 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
I`ll have to take some pics and upload them, I got this from an old gunsmith that said it was an original, it`s very old though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
How do I upload pics on my Post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Click on "GO ADVANCED" below the message window, click on "MANAGE ATTACHMENTS", then use the "Browse" button to find and upload files from your computer.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
I posted some pics , they should be visible now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
pics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,559
|
Well it's no Snider. Can you do a closeup of the lock markings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
3 band enfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
Some oddities: The "Tower" mark is not right and the date is below "Tower" rather than above it; there is no "V.R" under the crown. The hammer doesn't look right and, as I said, the date does not compute. By 1870, the Snider Mk III (a new rifle, not a conversion) was in production and the Martini was undergoing testing and would be adopted the following year. Muzzle loaders had not been produced since 1866.
It almost looks like the lockplate has been "scrubbed" and spurious markings put on. It is almost certainly not an original Tower lockplate as it is now. I can't fully explain all the anomalies on that gun, but it is not an original, untouched 3-band .577 Enfield and it was not made at Enfield in 1870. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
Thanks all
Last edited by Hos; 06-11-2012 at 09:33 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
|
Lock
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
I'm thinking it's a mongrel. Stock and fittings military (re military acceptance marks) Barrel either a whizzed out .577 Enfield (out to .69 is a pretty big "whizz", so maybe from somewhere else) Lock from a Snider conversion with a retro-fitted hammer. Also notice how the ramrod doesn't fit correctly. (From something shorter?? How long was the Snider or Martini of the era?
Maybe I'm all wet, but I willing to bet it's not original....... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|