|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Just got this pistol from my grandpa this Christmas. There are absolutely no marks, numbers, or words. Its just blank. He had it appraised in 1997 and has a tag around the trigger that doesnt give much information. The tag says 1730 to 1750 est. Mr. Snider. It says it is one of two dueling pistols and that a seller offered to buy it for $600. But if he had both pistols they would be worth $3000.
I have no idea what it fires. The hammer seems to be snapped off at the end. Anybody know anything about this? Value and history-wise? Any info is highly appreciated! Thanks in advance! ![]()
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Amity Orygun
Posts: 380
|
Hmmmm---A little more info? Bore diameter? Smoothbore or rifled?
NO marks at all--not even some weird little ones on the bottom of the barrel? Any marks under the grips? I'm not buying 1730 to 1750. Really can't be. That's the era of the flintlock, and this little cutie sure isn't a flinter. Maybe 1830 to 1850, which would put it solidly in the percussion caps heyday. I really can't tell WHAT this thing is supposed to be. If it's percussion, it's missing the nipple and that's a HEAVY hammer for a little gun. I'm almost leaning toward a Flobert parlor gun of some sort. Flobert came out with the .22 cal BB cap in the 1840's--and I have seen guns that relied on a heavy hammer to retain the cartridge as it fired. If the barrel is bored through and diameter is .22 on up to 6mm, my GUESS is Flobert style parlor gun of some sort. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
If "Mr. Snider" was the appraiser, I hope Grandad didn't pay him much..
![]() ![]() I'm not even sure it's a Flobert as I don't see a breech of any sort. Does it open in any way to insert a cartridge? If not, it may be a cap gun or a stage prop of some sort. The style reminds me of some of the toy guns shown in an old Adolf Frank catalog from around 1900. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,487
|
It is not a dueling pistol, and as stated it is not from the 1700's. It appears to a " parlor " type gun used for indoor games. I see no breech block so it either fired a low power Flobert type cartridge with the hammer acting as a breech block or else a pellet was shoved in the chamber and a percussion cap on top, or it could even be a blank firing gun.. Other wise it is not a firearm in that sense of the word. 600 dollars would have been more than 6 times it's real value. If it was a 'non' gun there may not be any proof marks applied. Could be wrong, been wrong before. However it is a fine historical piece showing the evolution of firearms and a very valuable heirloom.
__________________
RonJames Last edited by RJay; 12-26-2010 at 06:19 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: U.S.of A.
Posts: 376
|
A really wild guess but...
A child's "cap gun" from the Victorian era??? That hammer has a big flat face... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
It is not an 18th century duelling pistol; it is a Flobert type parlour pistol from around 1880-1910. The chamber appears to be blocked as if someone tried to deactivate it. There is a very mild collector interest, but mostly those guns are considered novelties, and bring around $100. If anyone offers the owner $600, I strongly suggest he take the money and run.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Wow, lots of replies! The breech is not plugged. And it IS rifled. It looks about the same size as a .22 and there IS bump on the hammer that could set off a cap... but it looks like its been worn dull. There are absolutley no marks except for 2 lines which i first thought were nothing but they are kind of odd. Maybe its nothing? Picture of the lines below. Sorry its not that good of quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Also, there is black powder residue inside the barrel. And the breech is too small for a .22 round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: far,far,North
Posts: 377
|
lboss2010
Can you please check the breech area and see if it was once threaded. ? The reson being is that at one time they used to build inline BP parlor pistols. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Amity Orygun
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
4mm Flobert---roughly .16 caliber 5.6mm Flobert----.22 caliber 6mm Flobert---pretty close to .24 caliber 9mm Flobert---around .36 caliber and probably others. Does it look like the hole in the breech end of the barrel is smooth enough to chamber a cartridge? Is the breech end hole the same size or slightly larger than the bore? Last edited by BillM; 12-27-2010 at 07:22 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,487
|
grcsat, your picture fits it to a T, that explains a lot about the gun, why the hammer is flat and no breech block. A percussion pellet gun using only the power of the percussion cap ( these type are still being sold )
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East Central Ill
Posts: 220
|
I have a .22cal muzzle loading rifle made like that.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Guns kill people, like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|