The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearm-related Activities > The Ammo & Reloading Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-19-2012, 05:30 AM   #1
Brian Albin
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
Default Block O frame orientation

The Bonanza 68 press turned the O frame sideways to get the tie down bar out of the operator's way. Why did this pattern not replace the original arrangement? Does it only appear better? Is it actually more clumsy? To me it looks better, but I have not tried one.

-->
Brian Albin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 02:24 PM   #2
mikld
Senior Member
 
mikld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 574
Default Re: Block O frame orientation

Dunno what the manufacturer had in mind, but I like the looks of it. With the "O" at right angles to the operator, it may be easier to put cases in the shell holder. When I operate my C-H single stage press I have to sit to the left (I'm right handed and pull the lever w/my right hand) of the press to easily use my left hand to feed the press. Mebbe with the frame at right angles it may be easier to feed? The only pics I've seen are left hand lever, but I'm sure the lever could be moved to the right side.
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast.
mikld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 07:11 PM   #3
Brian Albin
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
Default Re: Block O frame orientation

In the eighth edition John Amber's Handloader's Digest from 1978, it is right handled. The letters spelling BONANZA are correct so the photo is not reversed. This is the only picture I have seen. When I did a Google image search when I started this thread I found none. So I guess it must have had a short production run; which is all the more perplexing, as if nobody liked it. Perhaps due to advertising, as the Rockchucker was getting all the press at that time if I am remembering correctly. Or perhaps reloaders of that day were traditionalists who did not like the appearance of something new.

Last edited by Brian Albin; 08-21-2012 at 10:26 PM..
Brian Albin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com