|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
I bought this dpms 7.62 nato and have been asking a lot of questions about it because i like to understand my guns before i take them shooting. I asked some questions earlier about loading 308 for a semi auto. but i have been researching this and am finding out the different cup pressures between the two. Old posts here say i should NOT shoot 308 loads out of my 7.62 nato dpms. i called dpms and they said theres no differances between the two and i could shoot either. I dont place a lot of trust in the guy i talked to over the phone since he struggled to answer a bunch of my questions.
Question: what ammo can i put through this thing. Can i put both through or only 7.62nato rounds? Are there nato recipies for reloading? i have read too many things that are condradicting each other and is making me uncomfortable.
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!!
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,148
|
You will be just fine shooting either one, the problem exists when doing the opposite, that is, shooting 7.62 in a chamber designed to only shoot .308.
__________________
"Democracy is based on citizenship- perhaps the greatest gift the United States has given to the world- Power is vested in the people themselves, and government flows from the people" James M Henslin |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Contributor
Posts: 2,760
|
You will be fine, just follow your 308 Win load data, Start low and work up as in any handloading.
Here is some info to help. http://www.smellysmleshooters.net/ammopressure.htm http://www.surplusrifle.com/shooting...nato/index.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,319
|
the only differenc eis pressures. The 7.62X51 nato is loaded somewhere around 55K psi and the .308 win is loaded to around 65K psi, most current mfgred weapons chambered for the .308 are proofed for the higher pressures and will be ok to shoot both, or all 3 if you count the 7.62 CETME, which is the same again loaded to 45K psi...
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
Ok thanks for the info guys but help me understand this. Why is it ok to shoot a 308 in a 7.62 barrel and not ok to shoot a 7.62 in a 308 barrel if 308 has more pressures I would think it would be the opposite. I'm happy u guys are helping calm my nerves by the way!!
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Contributor
Posts: 2,760
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,319
|
shoot now you got me confused... Google time...
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 430
|
So let me understand this...... you DON'T trust the info given to you over the phone by someone at the company that makes the thing....but you WILL rely on info from total strangers on an internet forum?
Interesting decision making process.
__________________
Lee Anniversary and Lee Classic 4-Hole Turret, presently reloading .380, 7.62 Nagant (32-20), 9mm and 45ACP |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 7,863
|
I wouldn't be worried at all with any MODERN rifles...much less a DPMS.
But if you want to shoot an old Cetme, an old SMLE MII or MIIA, but ESPECIALLY one of the small ring 1916 Spanish small ring mausers rechambered from 7mm to 7.62 and advertised as ".308" I would pay attention...or any old military bolt gun with an INSERT that "allows" them to shoot .308.... I owned a 1916 Mauser once but couldn't bring myself to shoot it with ANYTHING and sold it, and for my Ishapore SMLE MArkIIA I ONLY shoot surplus 7.62 NATO in it...guys CLAIM they shoot .308 Win in theirs, but I keep thinking, 1964? India? Milsurp NATO is good enough for me!![]()
__________________
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Contributor
Posts: 2,760
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
As far as the total strangers on this forum, yes i do trust them. They have answered many questions that experts at companies and books have not answered. They have helped me out of many binds. Just because someone works at a company doesnt mean they know anything about they're products!
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota
Contributor
Posts: 2,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,319
|
good enough for me!
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,005
|
Yeah me too! Thanks again for the reassurance guys!
__________________
Liberalism: Poverty for ALL!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belton, Mo
Posts: 287
|
You all got scracting my head on CUP vs PSI so I went and looked at some books.
Here is what I found: .308 winchester 150grn bullet with H4895 listed in CUP 50000 Lymans .308 winchester 150grn bullet with H4895 listed in PSI 59000 Lees so what realy is the defferance? Here is what one book says about it: "Presently there are four principle methods of measuring breech pressure. The oldest is the copper crusher system. This involves having a test barrel with a hole in the chamber. The hole is fitted with a piston. A small copper cylinger rest on the top of the piston and below the anvil. When the gun is fired the expanding gas pushes the copper cylinger and crushes it against an anvil. The ballistician measurs the new length of copper cylinder and looks on a table to determine the pressure. This used be listed as the Pressure per Square Inch (PSI). Now it's called Copper Units of Pressure(CUP). For lower pressure laods Lead Units of Pressure is used. This technique is smilar to the CUP system except lead is used." Notice he said: "This used be listed as the Pressure per Square Inch (PSI). Now it's called Copper Units of Pressure(CUP)". This would make me think they are the same however when using the same powder with the same bullet you get 7k defferance in numbers they cant be the same. Now I am realy confused. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West, TX
Contributor
Posts: 1,257
|
I own a DPMS .308, and I reload using 43.3gr (maximum) of IMR 4895 with 168gr bullet. I have never had any signs of high pressure.
Interesting to note, the Hornady manual also has a chart for the .308 Service Rifle. I assume they mean .308 Nato. The maximum load using IMR 4895 on the Service Rifle chart is 41.9 gr. with a 168gr bullet. The manual says that a max load of IMR4895 produces 51,200psi. There are other powders on that same chart that show pressures around 58,000, so I am clearly in the safe zone even with a powder thrower that fluctuates a grain or two each time it throws powder. Last edited by bluesea112; 02-25-2011 at 02:00 AM.. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|