|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
I have this Cold 1851 Navy and need some expert opinions. The gun looks like it has been converted from BP to cartridge ammo. Now the cylinder has a lot of play in it. It can move at least a 1/6 of an inch back and fourth. The hammer has also been drilled to prevent the gun from being fired. I don't know if I should attempt to bring it back to it's BP roots or finish the conversion properly. Maybe just leave it as it is, sell it the way it is or break it up for parts and sell it that way. Can anyone give me any idea as to the value of this gun and any suggestions as to how you would handle such a situation. Also some of the parts need to be replaced in the gun. At this time it does not cock, the cylinder does not turn when the gun is cocked, when it was able to cock. I don't think these internal problems are very hard to fix, just thought I would mention them. Also it does say "Address SamL Colt Hartford Conn." on the barrel.
Thanks for your help richd44
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
I am no expert on Colts, but I wonder if what you have is a hybrid of some sort. Even though the barrel says "Colt", I don't think the rest of it is Colt.
Couple of clues.... The "double" stop notches in the cylinder are not Colt and where the lower part of the barrel meets the frame (below the wedge) doesn't look like it was originally made that way. Also, the cylinder doesn't have the usual "step" in it. Because it has obviously been "deactivated" I just wonder if it was assembled as some sort of a "prop" gun for the movies or stage play. It will be interesting what some of the the folks more familiar with Colts have to say. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
Come on guys, where are all the Colt 1851 guru's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: naugatuck,Ct.
Contributor
Posts: 6,668
|
Hang in there they will help
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,658
|
I think deadin called it.
The barrel does not fit the frame. That's not a Colt cylinder, both because of the double notches and the lack of the rollmarked naval battle. The gun appears to have been chromed. There is some type of mark stamped on the front of the frame, in front of the trigger and below the cylinder, but you haven't told us what that says. I don't know what you have, but you don't have an 1851 Colt.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,067
|
I'd agree with the above responses. Loading arm has been removed, also. Looks like a 'prop' gun of some sort. I'd leave it alone, and use it as a paperweight or a 'wall hanger'.
__________________
I don't know if dogs have a heaven, but there will be dogs in mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
I did do a little reading about this gun on my own. I found some that looks very much like this one. A small number were done in chrome. These guns were converted from BP to cartridge ammo around 1878. That is indicated by the stamp on the bottom of the grip "J. S. N". That's the stamp of the worker who worked on the gun. Also the cylinders were changed from the BP type to what I have now, that's why no engraving on the cylinder. The powder packing rods were also removes and the holes filled in as you can see in the pictures. I do think this is a 1851 Navy, it was just given a very half assed job of conversion. All the markings on the gun, the barrel, the side, and the butt of the grip, all match what I have seen in books that describe the Colt 1851 and those that have been converted. thanks to everyone who has responded to this post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Massachusetts
Posts: 53
|
![]() Here is my (admittedly repro) of an 1851 which looks like all other 1851's I've seen....to date anyway. Notice the way the frame curls under the front of the cylinder before it butts with the rear part of the frame, not like yours which stops at the front of the cylinder. Which is correct, I dunno, but I've seen others like mine and none like yours. Perhaps there was some variation over the years they were made?
__________________
US Army Security Agency 1967-71 Lifemember of: NRA, American Legion, DAV, AF&AM |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
Oldpilgrim, where do you live? I am in Carver, Ma.. We are probably very close to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Massachusetts
Posts: 53
|
closer than you think. Live in Middleboro, work in Plymouth.
I'll have to do some research on the 1851 to see why things are different.
__________________
US Army Security Agency 1967-71 Lifemember of: NRA, American Legion, DAV, AF&AM |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
http://www.armscollectors.com/mgs/co...ies_part_1.htm http://www.vincelewis.net/coltnavy.html http://www.milesfortis.com/mcump/mc18.htm What I am trying to do with this gun is to find out if it is worth converting back to BP or finishing the conversion to cartridge ammo so the gun is usable. Maybe the gun is only good for parts or as a conversation piece. At the moment I am in the process of getting my LTC. So at present I can't even bring the gun to gunsmiths to evaluate it. Richd44 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|