|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
|
I have a Kimber 300 WSM that I have been reloading for. I have a hornady headspace guage and the RCBS precision mic. The measurements are:
Hornady headspace guage measurements: Comparator + 0.420" bushing + Fireformed 300 WSM case= 3.741" Comparator + 0.420" bushing = 2.003" Headspace = 1.738" RCBS Precision Mic measurements: 1. Fireformed 300 WSM case= 1.7260" 2. Fireformed 300 WSM case= 1.7260" 3. Fireformed 300 WSM case= 1.7258" 4. Fireformed 300 WSM case= 1.7258" 5. Fireformed 300 WSM case= 1.7260" Average headspace using RCBS precision mic= 1.7259" RCBS precision mic table shows minimum dimension-1.7260" maximum dimension-1.7360" so there is a 0.012" difference using 2 different methods. I know as long as i stay consistent with measuring and setting my resizing die there will be no problem but my question is-there any reason anyone can think of why there is such a big difference? Thanks-lobo55
-->
Last edited by lobo55; 10-11-2009 at 07:54 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Contributor
Posts: 1,764
|
The RCBS precicion mic is made just for your 300wsm & has the shoulder angle just the same as your cartridges & I would guess it would have a more perfect datum spot. I would trust the precision mic to give your true headspace more than the Hornady.
The Hornady is a good unit & can be trusted to give good "relative" results. Hornady's 5 die set is advertised to cover 17 calibers. Problem is the shoulder angles can be different & the datum point changes. I wouldn't try for an exact reading with the Hornady, you just use it in a relative way to adjust your sizing die to set the shoulder where you want it. Works great for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
|
Thanks Popgunner.....
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|