The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Member Discussions > The Constitutional & RKBA Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2010, 02:49 AM   #1
Inthewind1976
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 533
Default Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

Well, our "Governor of the Soverign State of Philadelphia" strikes again.

http://www.ydr.com/rss/ci_16729906?source=rss

-->
Inthewind1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 12:33 PM   #2
rentalguy1
Former Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The mountains of NE TN.
Posts: 884
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

Quote:
Rendell stated that he didn't want to veto the Megan's Law legislation but had no choice if he wanted to strike down the Castle Doctrine, which he said would "encourage violent and deadly confrontation."
what a moron, but it's typical dem thinking...
rentalguy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 01:59 PM   #3
Big ugly
Advanced Senior Member
 
Big ugly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Knoxville Tennessee
Contributor
Posts: 2,603
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

I was suprised to see that a Democrat was wanting the Doctrine to go through. It is a shame that these states are more for the Criminals than for the Homeowners. and the fact the the Sexofenders get to come in there and not register with the LE community. I guess this is why Crime in Philly is goin absolutly through the roof.
__________________
"You say the Devil made do it with a smile. Raisin' hell and howlin at the moon. Well I'm gonna put your @$$ back in line. I'm gonna scare the Devil out of you."
BlackBerry Smoke Song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R513dA4peMg

Nothing is "proof" against a truly talented fool.
Swanshot
Big ugly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 05:40 PM   #4
Gun Geezer
Advanced Senior Member
 
Gun Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,710
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

Vote em out! End of problem!
Gun Geezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 09:36 PM   #5
user
Advanced Senior Member
 
user's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, West Virginia
Posts: 1,013
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

I wonder whether the common law of England is part of the law of Pennsylvania, as it is in Virginia. If so, then the common law castle doctrine may already be "good law" in Pa. Semayne's Case, (16O5) 77 Eng. Rep. 194 (K.B.), cited with approval in United States v. Gray, 491 F.3d 138, 145 (4th Cir. 2007).
__________________
=====
Daniel L. Hawes - 540 347 2430 - HTTP://www.VirginiaLegalDefense.com

By the way, nothing I say on this website as "user" should be taken as either advertising for attorney services or legal advice. Everyone having a question regarding the application of law to the facts of their situation should seek the advice of an attorney competent in the subject matter of the issues presented and licensed to practice in the relevant state.
user is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2010, 06:58 PM   #6
wyoredot
Senior Member
 
wyoredot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 553
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inthewind1976 View Post
Well, our "Governor of the Soverign State of Philadelphia" strikes again.

http://www.ydr.com/rss/ci_16729906?source=rss
surrounded by douchebags, we are.
__________________
Another gun-clinging conservative
Quote:
A true soldier fights not for what he hates in front of him, but for what he loves behind him. G.K. Chesterton
wyoredot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2010, 08:51 PM   #7
JohnTheCalifornian
V.I.P. Member
 
JohnTheCalifornian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 432
Default Re: Pennsylvania Castle Doctrine Vetoed

Quote:
Originally Posted by twangy View Post
So why LIVE there, and pay TAXES to such freaks, hmm? It is possible to live in states where such stuff isn't allowed, you know. If you stay, you are funding it, and thus, you are part of the problem.
Simple solution? Maybe.


Thats only possible if you have a job lined up, have the funds to move into a new house/apartment. Thats only if you were able to sell your house or get out from the lease you have on the apartment. With the economy the way it is today, thats just about impossible for people to do.


With the reasoning quoted above. If you spent your life moving out of a state because of some policy you did not like, well I'd hate to say it, but you will be moving for the rest of your life. You are not a part of the problem because you chose to stay in a state for ANY reason.
__________________
Im not a complete idiot.... parts are missing
JohnTheCalifornian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com