|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,253
|
looking at reloading for 9mm... what bullet weight was the cartridge designed for?
-->
Last edited by Caneman; 11-22-2011 at 10:30 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
115 RN is what the germans developed it with for use in the P-08 luger.
But it is suited to bullets weighing 90 to 147 grains. I have some SD loads with 90 gr XTPs that run 1450 fps from my CZ 75. And it isnt a +P load either. Most modern military and police model 9mm pistols are geared around 124 gr FMJ, all other commercial models should be geared toward 115 gr FMJ.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
Last edited by JLA; 11-22-2011 at 10:42 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 607
|
This is a common mis conception. The original 1902 spec ammo was a truncated 124.
http://cartridgecollectors.org/intro...tro9mmpara.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
Excellent read Boris. I read somewhere thet the original design was a 124 gr lead bullet but it wouldnt feed in the German Luger and was changed to the 115 FMJ before official production began, but i dont remember where i read it..
That is well documented information.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,253
|
thanks gents
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 607
|
Quote:
Good ole George never intended anything but a jacketed bullet to go down the bore of his pistol he designed. Even more impressive is the original spec for velocity. It was speced out to just a tad over 400ms. Some serious speed. That's why CIP spec 9mm blows the pants off SAAMIs way under powered spec..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
And is why the 25ACP in europe is generally considered a viable SD round, and over here is considered less powerful than a .22LR
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 607
|
Quote:
Same goes for 9x19mm CIP load data. Most loads for CIP start above where SAAMI loads it's max loads. I have a load in my CIP manual that gets 1207fps with a 147 grain XTP, from a four inch barrel..... That's like 35fps slower than 357SIG loads in that weight. SAAMI specs for a lot of calibers is below substandard. 9mm, 25ACP, 7.65Br. Even CIP 40S&W has a higher max psi. Their 10mm data shames SAAMI 10mm specs. If you all can, get yourself a CIP loading manual, do the conversions and hold onto your jaws if all you ever loaded was SAAMI spec ammo...... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|