The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Military > Vietnam Memories Forums - A Place For All Vets From Any Era > VMBB Fire For Effect

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2009, 05:44 AM   #1
rooter
*VMBB Senior Chief Of Staff*
 
rooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Marty Robbins old hometown, Glendale Arizona--a suburb of Phoenix.
Contributor
Posts: 9,335
Default HOT ISSUE ON GUN CONTROL...

A Gun Ban Gets Shot Down
By Michael Isikoff | NEWSWEEK
Published Mar 28, 2009
From the magazine issue dated Apr 6, 2009

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is now the second member of President Obama's cabinet to get shot down by the White House over the politically sensitive issue of assault weapons. After meeting with Mexican President Felipe Calderón, Clinton said that reinstating the U.S. ban on assault weapons—which was passed in 1994 and expired in 2004—is one step this country could take to curb the flow of guns to Mexico's drug cartels. "These military-style weapons don't belong on anybody's street," Clinton told NBC. Within hours, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters that he was unaware of "any plans" to push for such a ban—even though Obama had backed one during last year's campaign.

Attorney General Eric Holder had a similar experience a few weeks earlier. After he endorsed a ban at a Feb. 25 press conference, Justice officials were instructed by White House aides to drop the issue, according to administration and congressional aides who asked not to be named due to political sensitivities. What's behind the shift? A budding relationship between the gun lobby and Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill. After Holder mentioned the ban, the National Rifle Association sent out action alerts to its members and bombarded Hill offices with calls. Sixty-five House Dems dashed off a letter to Holder opposing such a ban, while Speaker Nancy Pelosi—echoing the NRA's mantra on all gun-control issues—said she backed "enforcing the laws we have now."

NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre told NEWSWEEK that Hill Democrats have "learned their lesson" from 1994, when they enacted the ban and subsequently lost control of Congress. They've also learned that cozying up to the NRA can pay big dividends. Last year Democrats received 20 percent of the nearly $1.2 million that the NRA pumped into congressional campaign coffers—more than twice what it gave to Dems just six years earlier. The way things are going, this could be more than a shotgun wedding.

© 2009
__________________





-->
rooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 10:56 AM   #2
rooter
*VMBB Senior Chief Of Staff*
 
rooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Marty Robbins old hometown, Glendale Arizona--a suburb of Phoenix.
Contributor
Posts: 9,335
Default Re: HOT ISSUE ON GUN CONTROL...

SORRY...DON'T KNOW WHY IT DOUBLED UP CHIEF
__________________




rooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 12:38 PM   #3
graehaven
Advanced Senior Member
 
graehaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,853
Default Re: HOT ISSUE ON GUN CONTROL...

And why is the NRA giving money to these idiots?

Yet another reason why I'm rethinking my NRA membership. What a bunch of retards.
__________________
The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas Jefferson

RESISTANCE IS FEUDAL... PREPARE TO SERVE.
graehaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 09:14 PM   #4
bcj1755
Advanced Senior Member
 
bcj1755's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A wretched hive of scum and villiany
Posts: 4,357
Default Re: HOT ISSUE ON GUN CONTROL...

I thought long and hard between the NRA and the GOA. I joined the GOA. The NRA makes too many compromises. Yes, the NRA does a LOT of good, but I don't believe in compromising MY right to self defense.

As to the White House apparently not wanting a new AWB, Barry knows it most likely will not pass. Besides, why go through the political dogfight of more gun laws....just tax ammo out the a**, which is what I think they'll do next. That way, ammo is too expensive for people to buy, then they will have an easier time confiscating empty firearms later on
bcj1755 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com