The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearm-related Activities > The Ammo & Reloading Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-09-2009, 08:25 AM   #1
Snakedriver
Advanced Senior Member
 
Snakedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW. Florida
Posts: 1,219
Default Magnum Primers???

I've been reloading my ammunition for over 25 years and have been very happy with the accuracy and performance of my home-made rounds. I've always used standard primers for my pistol and small rifle rounds, but now the new manuals are calling for "magnum" primers in most loads. This seems wasteful in small caliber rounds like .223 Rem.. What's your opinion???
__________________
Fear is a reaction..........Courage is a decision

-->
Snakedriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 10:55 AM   #2
312shooter
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,148
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

One good thing is, they seem to be the same price, it gives you the ability to reduce powder load and save a bit. Also availability is a bit better than standards because alot of reloaders feel as you do - using magnums is a waste or believe that magnum primers are only for magnum ammunition, dont be afraid to work up a load with them- if you have some data, I did with .308 and was really satistfied, particularly when large standard primers were 3 months backordered and the magnums were available immediately. Good Luck.
__________________
"Democracy is based on citizenship- perhaps the greatest gift the United States has given to the world- Power is vested in the people themselves, and government flows from the people" James M Henslin
312shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 11:58 AM   #3
Rocket J Squirl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 418
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

According to CCI, if your not loading 60 grains in a large rifle, they are a waste of time. You get more pressure without more FPS return.

I dont know what it is for pistol and small rifle, but I bet its a long the same line.

Compressed loads should work better.
Rocket J Squirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 02:14 PM   #4
312shooter
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 1,148
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

I shot 50 rounds of each, standard and magnum CCI primers, each with the same Accurate Arms 2520 powder load, under a Hornady 168 BTHP through my chrony via my M1A. I gained exactly 100 fps (93fps low to 108fps high) with the magnum primered loads. This data came from the Speer Load Manual #14.

The Speer manual shows magnum primers are used to attain their data for a 55gr bullet in .223 for the following powders: Win 748, AA2520, BL-C2, and H335.
__________________
"Democracy is based on citizenship- perhaps the greatest gift the United States has given to the world- Power is vested in the people themselves, and government flows from the people" James M Henslin
312shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 05:13 PM   #5
Bindernut
Advanced Senior Member
 
Bindernut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,452
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

Another thing is that sometimes the spherical powders (like WW748, WW760, etc) are harder to ignite than stick powders and mag primers will help get a better burn on the powder.
I don't have any .223-specific results to back this up, but when I'm using H414/WW760 in .22-250 and .22-6mm I get a much cleaner burn using mag primers. I don't need to use mag primers with IMR4064 (my other go-to for those two cartridges).

Last edited by Bindernut; 09-09-2009 at 10:49 PM.. Reason: typo
Bindernut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 07:00 PM   #6
Snakedriver
Advanced Senior Member
 
Snakedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW. Florida
Posts: 1,219
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

Very interesting, thanks to everyone for their well thought out responses. I guess I'll have to get some mag. primers and try them next time i see them.
__________________
Fear is a reaction..........Courage is a decision
Snakedriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 02:26 AM   #7
VegasTech702
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 360
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

I was able to get a box of large rifle standard primers a month ago, but no luck finding the magnums.
__________________
I am looking for a new, creative thing to say in my signature.
VegasTech702 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 04:46 AM   #8
madsenshooter
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Angola, IN
Posts: 1
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

Most of the loads you're seeing that call for magnum primers will be ball powders. Years ago I was using H414 and 760 in my Garand and M1A, mostly the M1A, and I was seeing dents on the cases that were fired after the first shot, powder granule sized dents. Standard primers weren't hot enough to fully ignite the H414 and unburned granules were falling back into the chamber when the case was extracted. A switch to magnum primers cleaned the problem right up and eliminated some vertical stringing too.
madsenshooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 07:19 AM   #9
Snakedriver
Advanced Senior Member
 
Snakedriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW. Florida
Posts: 1,219
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

Quote:
Originally Posted by madsenshooter View Post
Most of the loads you're seeing that call for magnum primers will be ball powders. Years ago I was using H414 and 760 in my Garand and M1A, mostly the M1A, and I was seeing dents on the cases that were fired after the first shot, powder granule sized dents. Standard primers weren't hot enough to fully ignite the H414 and unburned granules were falling back into the chamber when the case was extracted. A switch to magnum primers cleaned the problem right up and eliminated some vertical stringing too.
Very interesting, I use almost all ball powders because they meter more consistantly than the others. That's probably why I'm seeing the recommendation for the magnum primers in the new loading manuals. I haven't seen the problems you mention in my reloads, but I can understand them.
__________________
Fear is a reaction..........Courage is a decision
Snakedriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 07:37 AM   #10
LDBennett
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,715
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

While the discussion is about rifle calibers, Winchester Large Pistol Primers are for both regular and magnum caliber usage. In a magazine article a few years back all the brands and sizes were compared. The pictures showed the flame front for each one tested and the Winchester primers were the most energetic in the photos.

I use Hodgdon ball powders almost exclusively and Winchester primers exclusively. I've never had any problems but it may be because the Winchester primers are the most energetic (???).

LDBennett
LDBennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 09:50 AM   #11
woolleyworm
*TFF Moderator/Host*
 
woolleyworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,883
Default Re: Magnum Primers???

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDBennett View Post
While the discussion is about rifle calibers, Winchester Large Pistol Primers are for both regular and magnum caliber usage. In a magazine article a few years back all the brands and sizes were compared. The pictures showed the flame front for each one tested and the Winchester primers were the most energetic in the photos.

I use Hodgdon ball powders almost exclusively and Winchester primers exclusively. I've never had any problems but it may be because the Winchester primers are the most energetic (???).

LDBennett

Yes Sir, gotta say i have met with the same results, I prefer WLP's in my .45 loads with W231; they do perform better than Rem's or Magtechs that i have tried. I've had to experiment with the WLP's not being available; both the Rem and MagT's dropped my velocities approx 5% and didn't burn as cleanly. They both did perform well, just not as great as the Winchesters.
__________________
.
What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens)

"Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands."

"I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press."
.
woolleyworm is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 10:07 AM   #12
Bindernut
Advanced Senior Member
 
Bindernut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,452
Thumbs up Re: Magnum Primers???

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDBennett View Post
While the discussion is about rifle calibers, Winchester Large Pistol Primers are for both regular and magnum caliber usage. In a magazine article a few years back all the brands and sizes were compared. The pictures showed the flame front for each one tested and the Winchester primers were the most energetic in the photos.

I use Hodgdon ball powders almost exclusively and Winchester primers exclusively. I've never had any problems but it may be because the Winchester primers are the most energetic (???).

LDBennett
Yup, I can agree with yours and Wooleyworm's observations on WW being one of the hotter primers. At least a while back when WLR and WLRM were still silver-colored...
The ones that I've bought in the last couple years are now brass-colored but I haven't used em behind any ball powders so I don't know if they changed their "recipe" or just cut the plating step to eliminate one more cost.
With the old silver primers, I was still using WLRM behind my H414/WW760 loads in my .22-250.

Last edited by Bindernut; 09-10-2009 at 10:08 AM..
Bindernut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com