The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Member Discussions > General Discussion

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2005, 11:58 AM   #1
riderbob
V.I.P. Member
 
riderbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just west of " You sure do live a long way from town"
Posts: 227
Default This explains my signature.

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive...arr0101105.htm
__________________
"I'm not anti-government, I'm anti-slavery."

-->
riderbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:03 PM   #2
fishermanben
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 197
Default Re: This explains my signature.

It's the truth. Disarming the populace invites tyranny. In fact, I believe that disarming the public, in effect, creates tyranny. Good link.

Ben
fishermanben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:05 PM   #3
1952Sniper
Advanced Senior Member
 
1952Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,138
Default Re: This explains my signature.

Good article. I noticed he mentioned the Uniform Militia Act of 1792. Is this law still in effect? Or has it been repealed?
1952Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:30 PM   #4
SouthernMoss
*Admin Tech Staff*
 
SouthernMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW MS
Contributor
Posts: 10,651
Default Re: This explains my signature.

Quote:
The goal of gun control is not to actually control guns and make the world a safer place, but to control people.
Quote:
Liberals know gun control laws will not stop criminals, but it will erode the sense of independence and self reliance of regular people until they feel that they can do nothing that does not meet government approval.
These two sentences say it all.
__________________


My Second protects your First


"I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man,
but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." - Susan B Anthony
SouthernMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:45 PM   #5
SouthernMoss
*Admin Tech Staff*
 
SouthernMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW MS
Contributor
Posts: 10,651
Default Re: This explains my signature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1952Sniper
Good article. I noticed he mentioned the Uniform Militia Act of 1792. Is this law still in effect? Or has it been repealed?
Uniform Militia Act of 1792, ch. 33, 1 Stat. 271, repealed by Dick Act, ch. 196, 32 Stat. 775 (1903).




An Indiana Law Journal article says the following:
Quote:
The Uniform Militia Act of 1792 was replaced at the beginning of this century by the Militia Act of 1903. [81] This act divided the militia into two separate classes. The organized militia, which was "to be known as the National Guard of the State, Territory, or District of Columbia" constituted one class, with the remaining members of the militia constituting the other class designated as the Reserve Militia. [82] While the statute contained provisions for supplying arms to the organized militia or National Guard, [83] there was no provision for supplying arms to the Reserve Militia. Thus, the tradition of militiamen supplying their own arms continues today. [84]
__________________


My Second protects your First


"I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man,
but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand." - Susan B Anthony
SouthernMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:52 PM   #6
1952Sniper
Advanced Senior Member
 
1952Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,138
Default Re: This explains my signature.

Interesting. Thanks, SoMo. But I wonder if it's still technically considered compulsory for the unorganized militia to keep and bear arms. Even though we have to supply it ourselves.

Yes, I'm looking for some ancient and little-known law that forces us to own firearms. Wouldn't that be great?
1952Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 12:59 PM   #7
Texas_Shooter
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: way out in the boonies
Posts: 136
Default Re: This explains my signature.

Quote:
Yes, I'm looking for some ancient and little-known law that forces us to own firearms. Wouldn't that be great?
In Switzerland, all males aged 20-42 are required to keep a firearms at home.
Texas_Shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com