semi recent US history question - The Firearms Forum

jack404 · 10-11-2011, 08:08 PM

who was the politician who claimed that the signs of domestic terrorists include reading tom clancy, having NRA bumper stickers and similar ??

Marlin T · 10-11-2011, 08:23 PM

http://www.infowars.com/secret-state...re-terrorists/

jack404 · 10-11-2011, 08:30 PM

Cheers Marlin i got the report but some politician was touting it as Gospel and raising fears about militia's and how they where paranoid about losing thier guns then within 3 minutes of saying that stating they should all be disarmed because of that paranoia..

cycloneman · 10-11-2011, 08:30 PM

I did a google search and didn't find anything

BTW where are all of these so called domestic producers of man made catastrophy?

Why do civil Americans get called this? It seems to me that the democrat's do a pretty good job of calling for violence. Why aren't they on the list?

pickenup · 10-11-2011, 11:21 PM

Is this what you are looking for?

If so, it was a report by the Missouri Information and Analysis Center (MIAC). The MIAC is a branch of the state highway patrol.

It included anyone who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr or Chuck Baldwin. The Greek phrase "Molon Labe". The "Don't tread on me" flag.

It also targets gun enthusiasts and 2nd amendment advocates. Other groups targeted are Christians, Citizens who oppose the income tax, and those who are against illegal immigration in this country. Another odd group who is targeted, are citizen organizations that exist to aid local government during a crisis.

Among other dastardly devious people.

jack404 · 10-11-2011, 11:34 PM

the report i have , and yes it is the basis of what i was after , but more to the point was the politician who touted this (^@& as a official government report on who the real bad guys are and not the biased socialist tirade it actually was ..

pickenup · 10-13-2011, 12:52 AM

Are you talking about Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who sponsored H.R. 2159, the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009
and H.R.495, See Something, Say Something Act of 2011?

Or Rep. Billy Long R-MO?

jack404 · 10-13-2011, 01:18 AM

billy long smells familiar , i'll look up his speeches and let you know

cheers for that

jack404 · 10-13-2011, 01:25 AM

sorry Jay Nixon is the mutt i was after found him by looking up Billy long and saw where Mr Long railed against the guy after he touted the document as "The List of All terrorists in the USA"

but left out PETA other extreamist animals rights and nature groups and all of islam )

and add that lady Macaskill too , meeting with CAIR and apologuising for how badly the world has treated islam

what rot!!

jstgsn · 10-13-2011, 12:03 PM

‘They Don’t Love This Country’: Congresswoman Linda Sanchez Says Tea Party and Republicans Are Unpatriotic, Hate America and Are Screwing the Working Class Because They Don‘t Agree With Obama’s Policies

Gun Geezer · 10-13-2011, 09:22 PM

Funny, I thought it was the right, even the duty of every American to question the motives of their elected representatives, especially when they no longer appear to represent the best interests of the people, as in Congress and the POTUS.

10-11-2011, 08:08 PM	#1
jack404 Former Guest Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Australia Contributor Posts: 17,622	semi recent US history question who was the politician who claimed that the signs of domestic terrorists include reading tom clancy, having NRA bumper stickers and similar ?? -->

10-11-2011, 08:23 PM	#2
Marlin T Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: New Mexico Posts: 7,857	Re: semi recent US history question http://www.infowars.com/secret-state...re-terrorists/ __________________ "But the simple truth--born of experience--is that tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people." Judge Alex Kozinski - United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government. - Thomas Paine Did you read todays GOOD shooting? >>>KEEPANDBEARARMS.COM <<<

10-11-2011, 08:30 PM	#3
jack404 Former Guest Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Australia Contributor Posts: 17,622	Re: semi recent US history question Cheers Marlin i got the report but some politician was touting it as Gospel and raising fears about militia's and how they where paranoid about losing thier guns then within 3 minutes of saying that stating they should all be disarmed because of that paranoia..

10-11-2011, 08:30 PM	#4
cycloneman Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Louisiana Posts: 7,434	Re: semi recent US history question I did a google search and didn't find anything BTW where are all of these so called domestic producers of man made catastrophy? Why do civil Americans get called this? It seems to me that the democrat's do a pretty good job of calling for violence. Why aren't they on the list? __________________ Who are you going to serve today?

10-11-2011, 11:21 PM	#5
pickenup Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains Posts: 6,841	Re: semi recent US history question Is this what you are looking for? If so, it was a report by the Missouri Information and Analysis Center (MIAC). The MIAC is a branch of the state highway patrol. It included anyone who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr or Chuck Baldwin. The Greek phrase "Molon Labe". The "Don't tread on me" flag. It also targets gun enthusiasts and 2nd amendment advocates. Other groups targeted are Christians, Citizens who oppose the income tax, and those who are against illegal immigration in this country. Another odd group who is targeted, are citizen organizations that exist to aid local government during a crisis. Among other dastardly devious people. __________________ The gene pool needs chlorine

10-11-2011, 11:34 PM	#6
jack404 Former Guest Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Australia Contributor Posts: 17,622	Re: semi recent US history question the report i have , and yes it is the basis of what i was after , but more to the point was the politician who touted this (^@& as a official government report on who the real bad guys are and not the biased socialist tirade it actually was ..

10-13-2011, 12:52 AM	#7
pickenup Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains Posts: 6,841	Re: semi recent US history question Are you talking about Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who sponsored H.R. 2159, the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009 and H.R.495, See Something, Say Something Act of 2011? Or Rep. Billy Long R-MO? __________________ The gene pool needs chlorine

10-13-2011, 01:18 AM	#8
jack404 Former Guest Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Australia Contributor Posts: 17,622	Re: semi recent US history question billy long smells familiar , i'll look up his speeches and let you know cheers for that

10-13-2011, 01:25 AM	#9
jack404 Former Guest Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Australia Contributor Posts: 17,622	Re: semi recent US history question sorry Jay Nixon is the mutt i was after found him by looking up Billy long and saw where Mr Long railed against the guy after he touted the document as "The List of All terrorists in the USA" but left out PETA other extreamist animals rights and nature groups and all of islam ) and add that lady Macaskill too , meeting with CAIR and apologuising for how badly the world has treated islam what rot!! Last edited by jack404; 10-13-2011 at 01:28 AM..

10-13-2011, 12:03 PM	#10
jstgsn Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Milford, Delaware Contributor Posts: 1,314	Re: semi recent US history question ‘They Don’t Love This Country’: Congresswoman Linda Sanchez Says Tea Party and Republicans Are Unpatriotic, Hate America and Are Screwing the Working Class Because They Don‘t Agree With Obama’s Policies __________________ Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he will just kill you.

10-13-2011, 09:22 PM	#11
Gun Geezer Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Central Florida Posts: 1,716	Re: semi recent US history question Funny, I thought it was the right, even the duty of every American to question the motives of their elected representatives, especially when they no longer appear to represent the best interests of the people, as in Congress and the POTUS.