|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
|
I want to purchase a handgun. I would really like a S&W Model 29, but they are out of what I can afford. How good or bad is the Ruger Blackhawk .41 Magnum? Thanks.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,832
|
I haven't really heard anything bad about the Blackhawk, other then a few cases about sharp corners in the earlier models. Not sure about the .41 mag, why not the more common .357 mag or .44 mag.
__________________
Long Gun Collection: M38 Mosin-Nagant Carbine Russian 1950 SKS Winchester 1300 20Ga Western Field Single-Shot 16Ga Sears Ranger .22S-L-LR Bolt-Action Rifle Marlin 795 Semi-Auto (Brother's) Handgun Collection: Springfield Armory XD9 Service |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 4,788
|
My girlfriend's brother has one in .44 mag, and it's just a peach. It's his deer hunting gun. I don't know how the .41 mags are, but I'm sure they're just about the same.
__________________
Nothing posted on TheFirearmsForum.com constitutes legal, accounting, gunsmithing, or other professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals for real advice. Your life is lived at your own risk. Don't blame me for the dumb things you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albuquerque NM USA - 6000' above sea level
Posts: 59
|
The 4 5/8" Blackhawk .41 was the .41 that I owned the longest. It was strong as a bull moose and as accurate as a laser (. . . just like most .41s). The trigger was not the best. The overall size was larger than it needed to be due to the old-fashioned SA styling - this is why I eventually sold it off and replaced it with a Model 57.
You'll be happy; it's a great gun for the money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
|
Thanks for the input. I really appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carson City Nevada
Posts: 145
|
Ruger makes very good utilitarian stuff but I would suggest that you either consider a 357 (their new flat tops are cool) or save your money until you can afford the 29 Smith you want. The reason I suggest this it that any high recoil single action is only fun to shoot a few times with stock grips. The other thing is that the 41 mag is all but dead and from a resale standpoint you can always get rid of a 357 or 44 a lot easier than a 41 anything should you decide something different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Contributor
Posts: 897
|
Ruger's .41 Blackhawk with a 6.5 inch barrel has been my deer gun for 20 years now. Not one of the several deer taken have needed a second shot. It is a great cartridge, although not very popular at this time. If you handload, you can really get the maximum potential. As far as the trigger goes, Wilson makes a good replacement, it will make a difference. By the way, I'd love to get my hands on a 4 inch S&W Mod. 57, they are just a bit scarce around here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14
|
If you look at the ballistics of 44 vs 41 mag you'll find some interesting stuff. The 41 carries it's energy farther and shoots flatter. The 44 isn't that much bigger in diameter (actually .429 not .44) Like the 10mm,38super and some others that seem superior to what becomes the most popular, the 41 doesn't get its due. IMO
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|