|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 18
|
How can I determine if my rifle is stainless steel ? I know this may seem like a dumb question, but I have to ask it anyways.
I have my father's Arisaka rifle (given to him by his father) and ever since I can remember it appeared stainless. I know this is very far fetched, but it shines like stainless (but only in the areas visible without the furniture...the inner areas are blued) I'm pretty sure it may have just had blueing removed at some point...but you never know til you ask. Thanks ! Scott
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
100 % sure it's not stainless but you can always double check with a magnet. if it sticks it's carbon steel if it doesn't it's stainless. if it sticks lightly it's a low grade stainless
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Imperial, MO
Posts: 3,617
|
If the inner areas are blued then no its not stainless. Bluing stainless is a long drawn out process which I know the Japanese did not take the time to do. I have never seen or heard of a Stainless Type 99. Someone was just good with a buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,485
|
If indeed you are referring to a WWII Japanese Arisaka { and I don't know what else it could be. ), rest assured that it is not stainless. Cobra, not a dumb question, but one that with just a little research could have been answered by your self. Stainless steel was known and in use in the late 1800's, however the first use in a complete production firearm did not take place until the 1960's.
![]()
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,648
|
Quote:
I just took a magnet and wandered around the house. My stainless cooking pots and pans are non-magnetic. My stainless flatware and cutlery are magnetic. My dog's stainless food pan is slightly magnetic, while her stainless water bowl is non-magnetic. My S&W 65 and 696, however, are both strongly magnetic.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
true enough you'll be able to find "stainless" that is magnetic. it's a lower grade stainless with a higher carbon count than gun grade stainless. now keep in mind some so called stainless is just clad in stainless but under the clading it's carbon steel. and with out getting into ions and being able to magnetize stainless it's just a standard rule of thumb. but it's has to be higher then 304 ss. there is type 17-4 which is 17% chromium 4% nickel high carbon %, 304 ss is 18-8 higher in nicle and chromium then there is 316 ss.... and it goes on and upward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,828
|
i used to have a stainless lock box that a magnet wouldnt touch. but my smith 4006 is very magnetic. wonder what type of stainless smith makes theirs out of
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
In the meantime, I'm not really interested in the $ value of the weapon, but I would like it to be a shooter...and since I have no kids, it will go to my nephew some day. I'm in the process of cleaning it up (which it doesn't need much) and will post some pics soon. Thanks guys ! Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Contributor
Posts: 1,467
|
Carbon steel is never "clad" in stainless. There are platings like industrial hard chrome that look like stainless, though. Most SS used in guns is magnetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,828
|
why do they use stainless steel that is magnetic? is there certain properties that makes this steel good for guns and the other steel not as desireable
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
notice i said some "so called stainless steel" is cladding. in my neck of the woods we call a plated coating cladding. cladding is a metal coating bonded onto another metal or so says webster, isn't something plated a bonded surface covering ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
john, there are various types of stainless. ferritic , and martensitic , most guns are made of the martensitic type since it is more machineable. however unless made with a 304L or 316L etc... they will be slightly magnetic. the L means in most cases less then 0.03% carbon steel. standard 304 is 18/4 and still has a higher % carbon steel. but you'll notice when placeing a magnet on your smith 4006 it isn't as magnetic as a fender of your car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,710
|
Maybe this will reduce the confusion:
Steel is an alloy of different elements. The most prevalent is iron. Some steel alloys use various mixtures of chrome, molybdenum, and many other elements. The more chrome that is added the more resistant the steel is to surface oxidation or rust. This alloy of steel is called "Stainless". That is, it is stained less by surface oxidation than pure iron. No stainless steel alloy is absolutely rust proof. The more chrome added the less magnetic the alloy of steel becomes. Stainless steel is prone to galling when run against itself or other metals. It took decades for S&W (a leader in the introduction of stainless steel to guns) to find combinations of alloys to use in the various parts of the gun to avoid galling. Finding the right alloy for barrels was also a tough task. S&W stainless guns might have alloys in them that have less chrome in them allowing them to be somewhat magnetic. LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Contributor
Posts: 2,387
|
well explained lots better than my stumbling explaination
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|