|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Adnanced Senior Member
Posts: n/a
|
obelix2
Member Posts: 178 (5/9/01 7:45:07 am) Reply | Edit | Del All Crimea -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why did not a man wonder? I kind of think I would have wondered, myself, though it's supposed to be real tricky turning a warhorse the other way when he's running with the pack, especially when you've got a couple of regiments of hussars and light dragoons thundering behind you. Secondary question: Does anybody know if the British infantry were actually equipped with the new 1853 Enfield rifles? Rons Toys Moderator Posts: 112 (5/9/01 9:14:38 am) Reply | Edit | Del Re: Crimea -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.dnai.com/~soongliu/Sa...Brits.html www.nps.gov/vick/interp/lhrifle.htm nice pics www.geocities.com/heartla...flesof.htm Ron obelix2 Member Posts: 179 (5/9/01 2:53:51 pm) Reply | Edit | Del Thanks, Ron -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nice links. polishshooter Senior Chief Moderator Staff Posts: 448 (5/11/01 10:43:39 pm) Reply | Edit | Del Re: Crimea -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think it has something to do with the Brits getting as much if not more "glory" in defeat as much as victory...the French are notorious for that too... I mean, any country that has a General lose as badly as Cornwallis in the south and at Yorktown, that goes on to fame and glory with an even bigger command in India, has got to have a different "code of honor..." In America, unless you are Ambrose Burnside ( ) one strike and you're out...
-->
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|