|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 15
|
has anybody had any experience with the EAA Witness Compact chambered in 10mm? if so what did you think of it?
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,552
|
none personally
but i think it will be a crap shoot ,they have a reputation like AMT , hit and miss ,but i have to say my amt is a good working accurate gun ,but being a 10mm might change things |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,715
|
gpostal:
I have a Witness in 45ACP with a standard barrel length. My gun shoots well, is reliable, and I am pleased with it. It mimicks (copies) the CZ97 in almost every detail. In fact trigger parts interchange between the two guns. The CZ is slightly better made and their past performance, judged by reponses here and other sites, is better than the EAA Witness. At least the CZ's are consistient. I have both the CZ and the Witness in 45ACP but the real differences are only superficial and minor. I'd go with a CZ (I have Czech heritage and own several CZ motorcyles and CZ rifles). I had a Tangfolio TZ75 (the Italian manufacturer of the EAA Witness) that literally fell apart due to poor materials selection by the manufacturer and was virtually unrepairable as there were no parts available. I eventually junked it. The new Witness's appear to be better made. And the CZ's are superb! LDBennett |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|