|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 3
|
Hello I am new to these fourms and will be on a lot. I recently graduated from college and am looking to purchase one .22 cal LR rimfire pistol. Due to limited funds and the fact I love to shoot I am seeking advice on the best possible pistol for both small game hunting (rabbits, squirrals, etc) and plinking. This leads me to my question I am only able to afford one fun shooter for several years, I shoot a lot and am seeking a gun that will allow several hundred thousand rounds to be put through over the next few years. Typically I run through 2-3k rounds on a average weekend. I have narrowed my choices to 2 particular models the Ruger sp101 revolver in .22 cal or the semi Mark III ruger .22 cal. Do any other owners of these particular models notice problems after short or long periods of time? If so what and what one would you recommend? also how is the quality build of these models and how much do you shoot. Thanks.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NE North Carolina
Posts: 325
|
I have a Sig Sauer Mosquito and my wife has a GSG 1911 and a Browning Buckmark. We love all 3 guns, but probably the most accurate and dependable would be the Buckmark.
Donnie D |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,318
|
2000 - 3000 in a weekend? That is a lot of shooting. I would also have to say the Browning Buckmark. I've had mine for about 18 years and it has been flawless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 374
|
You won't go wrong with the Ruger Mark III.
(I have the Mark II)
__________________
OS The most important question you can ever answer: "Who do you say I am?" - Jesus Christ - Luke 9:20 http://www.gty.org/resources/articles/A335 Last edited by One Shot; 02-25-2012 at 06:30 PM.. Reason: additional info |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stafford, VA
Contributor
Posts: 3,071
|
Any of the above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 1,440
|
Ruger MKIII...I swear mine is like a hand held rifle. A good MKII is also a fine choice and you can pick up a good used one for $250.
__________________
MORS DE CONTACTUS-DEATH ON CONTACT |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeast Georgia
Contributor
Posts: 6,358
|
I have a Ruger mark III 22/45 and I don't think you can wrong with either Ruger. I don't think I put 2000-3000 round a year through mine!! I have a cheapo red dot scope on mine and it is very accurate.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member GeorgiaCarry.Org Member Retired US Army Postal Worker Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 1,440
|
Did you mean 2-3 Hundred? Thats a lot of rounds....
__________________
MORS DE CONTACTUS-DEATH ON CONTACT |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 3
|
yes 200 - 300 a week end but I want somthing very reliable as it will be my only pistol my 30-06 rounds are to expensive to just keep shooting 100+ on a average saturday at about 200-600 yards target. Unfortuntly my place is kinda small so reloading is out of the question for now. Thus I am seeking very good pistol that is reliable for many years to come that can keep shooting provided proper care is given I end up shooting between 2k -3k .22 cal a month sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 635
|
Never experienced a malfunctioning .22 pistol, but because most 22LR ammo isn't very consistent, you'll have jams every now and then. I think it comes down to what you like. Can't go wrong with a Browning Buckmark or a Ruger Mark III. Ruger now has the SR22, I think it costs more than the Mark III.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: East of DFW
Posts: 230
|
Any of the major manufacturers has decent choices. I shoot a Browning Buckmark, and Ruger Mk III. My next choice will most likely be a Beretta U22. They all have good reviews and quality made. It gets down to personal choice and fitting your hand. Any of these should be worth the investment and last a long time, in no particular order.
Beretta U22 Browning Buckmark Ruger Mark III Smith & Wesson 22A Wather P22 Target I would prefer a longer barrel variant for shooting small game, plinking and target. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 140
|
I have the buckmark camper, it is awesome. I have recently shot the ruger though and love it too. Both are fantastic and comes down to personal preference. I right now want to buy a 22 revolver and the sig 1911-22. (but lacking funds I think the old proverb of which hand fills up first will come true!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ohio NRA Member
Contributor
Posts: 5,372
|
Quote:
I own neither of the handguns, but have put several thousands rounds through both. With the MRK III, you'll have to find the right ammo that it likes. The SP 101 is a very good revolver and I only have one complaint about it and it's the small grip. I have large hands and it just dont fit right. (Glad to hear I'm not the only one that spends lots'a $'s on .22 ammo!) lolI shoot the CCI Blazer's in both guns and both are great shooters!
__________________
Two Words; "Simple Man", song by Charlie Daniels sums up my thoughts on a "few things"!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near a brook & pond in Ma
Posts: 734
|
I have the Ruger Mark II Government Model and and the Buckmark. I prefer the Ruger!
Cliff |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,747
|
I have a Ruger Mark ll and Mark lll. Like em both. the Mark ll is about 20 years old or more. I have shot many thousands of rounds through it and it has held up fine. I can't think of a better choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,630
|
Tezz, welcome from the GREAT STATE OF IOWA! Browning Buckmark and Ruger Mk III. Can't go wrong with either one. Ruger is generally lower in initial cost. I prefer Buckmark!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 120
|
+1 for either the buckmark (I Own one and a Challenger III with thousands of rounds through it) or the Ruger Mark XXX series. both are durable multi function (Hunting, target, or plinking) and you can get replacement parts or accessories for either of their newer models online.
I'd recommend that whichever one that you do choose, research the most common parts to wear out and buy them as soon as you can afford to once you buy your pistol. good luck, and good shooting Curlyjoe |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago IL Area
Contributor
Posts: 3,305
|
I have a Ruger Blackhawk single six. Bought it new in 1976. Shoots as good today as it did back then. This gun is dead on. I don't think you can go wrong with a Ruger.
__________________
Criminals advocate stronger gun laws to foster a safer work environment. This limits their exposure to risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 3
|
Thanks for all the info everyone I will look into all the verying firearms and than make a decision based all the input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 60
|
My son is still shooting his grampa's Ruger MKI, which is older than he is, and he is a '79 model. What is commonly said about Ruger revolvers is that you will not wear one out in two lifetimes. You can not go wrong either way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: i live in southern indiana,old country boy at heart
Posts: 1,506
|
as per your request.i only see two pistols that would fit this bill.the ruger mark series I,II,or III.my other would not be your 101 but the ruger single six.i have had mine for over thirty years and the only problem i have had is i neglected to tighten a screw and i lost it.ruger sent me one at no charge. old semperfi
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ohio NRA Member
Contributor
Posts: 5,372
|
<<<< the Single Ten's are a FINE unit. I've put "literally" thousands of rounds through mine and not a problem yet!
__________________
Two Words; "Simple Man", song by Charlie Daniels sums up my thoughts on a "few things"!
Last edited by Zane71464; 02-10-2012 at 06:51 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: T-Town
Posts: 7
|
I've fired thousand of rounds through my Browning Buckark that I've owned for 17yrs now. It's the most accurate pistol I own and probably my favorite to shoot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
|
I have been shooting a ruger Mark1 for 20 + years & I bought it used, I had a buckmark, the Mark1 short bull barrel is a lot more rugged, if you shoot a lot of the lead bullets it can jam, quick swab, a little oil and shoot more. The Ruger and The Browning are both great guns. Goodluck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7
|
I bought a ruger mark 111 target pistol, stainless steel, 10 inch bull barrel, in about 1987.
Fantastic pistol. Very accurate, good for squirrels, snakes, rabbits, armadillos, target shooting etc. It has never jammed in all this time. Had a few misfires due to bad ammo, but that is expected. Can not say enough good about the weapon. Suggest buying 3 clips (10 rounds each). I paid $187 for mine, but quite a bit more expensive now. But whatever you pay for it you won't be disappointed in the performance or accuracy |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| mark iii, ruger, sp101 .22cal |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|