|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: FEMA Region IV
Contributor
Posts: 1,445
|
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Harriman, Tn
Contributor
Posts: 2,566
|
Interesting. I'll have to give my daughter a call and find out if she's heard anything. She's a crew chief on the 22's.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 197
|
This seems pretty silly to me. We have been using OBOGS O2 systems for about 25 yrs. Why can't these bozos get this thing right? If they can't get it right, replace the damn thing with LOX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: va., conn., & mo.
Posts: 948
|
lox...been there done that. time proven.
if its not broken, dont fix it. go back to it. out with the new, in with the old.... for once. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 197
|
OBOGS is an osmotic system where you separate oxygen from air, leaving fairly pure O2 on one side and enriched nitrogen on the other side. O2 to the aircrew, enriched nitrogen to the fuel tanks. OBOGS systems have a lot of advantages. You eliminate the need for a cryogenic system to make the LOX, you eliminate a hazardous LOX system from the aircraft, and as a byproduct of getting oxygen from the air, you have an enriched nitrogen gas that you can use instead of air to assist in fuel transfer and as a fire suppressant in the fuel system. A real win-win situation. Why can’t these bozos get it right?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|