The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearm-related Activities > The Ammo & Reloading Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2012, 08:21 PM   #1
garirepp
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dubois
Posts: 2
Default 22-6mm ackley improved

Is ther a manual for reloading this cartridge

-->
garirepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 09:35 PM   #2
Bindernut
Advanced Senior Member
 
Bindernut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,433
Default Re: 22-6mm ackley improved

The latest Hornady manual (7th Ed.) has a short section on a basic .22-6mm.
Otherwise, not per se...
There are quite a few different versions of the .22-6mmRem wildcats out there. All of them have similar case volumes but slightly different shoulder angle, body taper, etc.
It's not a commercially accepted cartridge yet either and I don't see any listing in the SAAMI pressure specs for the cartridge in my data sheets. You seldom see any wildcat cartridges listed in the mainstream manufacturer's manuals.


Besides the Hornady manual...
For starters you can use data for the 5.6x57mm RWS, which is the 7x57 Mauser necked down to .224"...basically the same since the .244/6mmRem is also based on the 7x57 case. It is a fairly low-pressure cartridge compared to how most wildcatters are loading the .22-6mm so velocities look very similar to the Swift.
This is what I worked with when I had my .22-6mm back in the early 90s. But I also had some proven loads from the rifle's previous owner that I usually stuck with.
My results with a 30° shoulder, straight-walled version were basically 150-200fps faster than the .220Swift. With a regular .22-6mm (a non-Improved version) you can expect 100-150fps over Swift velocities without going crazy on the pressure.

If you are a member over there, www.loaddata.com has a few loads listed for the .22-6mm that were apparently published in Issue 216 of Handloader magazine.
http://www.loaddata.com/members/sear...loading%20Data
I have never subscribed to the site and it's been quite a few years since I've subscribed to either Handloader or Rifle so I'm not sure how good their data is...
I tend to stick with manufacture published data unless it's something that I'm brewing up myself.

Last edited by Bindernut; 06-30-2012 at 09:40 PM..
Bindernut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com