|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 278
|
KHARTOUM, Sept 15 (Reuters) - Sudan has rejected a U.S. request to send a platoon of Marines to bolster security at the U.S. embassy in Khartoum, the state news agency SUNA said on Saturday.
On Friday, a U.S. official told Reuters that Washington would send Marines to Sudan to improve security at the embassy after protesters entered the mission in a demonstration against a film that insults the Prophet Mohammad. "Sudan is able to protect the diplomatic missions in Khartoum and the state is committed to protecting its guests in the diplomatic corps," Foreign Minister Ali Ahmed Karti told SUNA. ( Oh and one more thing ..NO MORE MONEY !!!
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago IL Area
Contributor
Posts: 3,316
|
Time to pull out....
__________________
Criminals advocate stronger gun laws to foster a safer work environment. This limits their exposure to risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,440
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: US of A
Contributor
Posts: 1,837
|
I say just another flee bitten country that is in need of a "Reset".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Eastern Missouri
Posts: 1,029
|
They've been sending in Marines who are a part of a unit specially trained for events like this, and yes they bring their firepower with them. We've already sent in at least two teams that I've read about to embassies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moore, Idaho
contributor
Posts: 2,650
|
Seems to me that it's OUR Embassy - who the hell needs permission to send in some extra guards? Tell them the extra Marines are coming or else the Embassy leaves and Sudan can go to hell. No more American money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Livingston, Texas
Posts: 50
|
It's the International Rules of Conduct, that the host country protects and guards all the embassies and missions within it. However, lately we don't trust their commitment. If they are unwilling or unable to protect out diplomatic missions, than I saw we don't need to be there.
__________________
Dan Hedgpeth Member: American Legion, Former Texas Ranger Association, Fraternal Order of Police, Retired California Peace Officer Association, Life Member of NRA Last edited by UncleDannie; 09-16-2012 at 12:05 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The true northern Cal
Posts: 1,562
|
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. But I was under the assumption that we own the property under every one of our embassys. Just as every nation that has an embassy in the US owns the property it sits on. So if we own it, then we can occupy it any way we choose. F them. Send in the MARINES.
__________________
It ain't broke it just lacks duct tape. The nice thing about opinions is everybody has one. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|