Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? - The Firearms Forum

The Count · 10-24-2012, 05:03 PM

I use H335 with pretty good success (less than 1/2 MOA at 100Y) in my .223 and 308. Just bought myself a Rem 700 stainless in 300 WM. Can't find any loads using this powder. Is it just way to fast for the larger cartridges?

Bindernut · 10-24-2012, 09:10 PM

H335 is pretty fast burning for a large-case like the .300WinMag. It's pretty identical in performance to Reloder15 and IMR3031...too fast a burner to get peak velocity before you start running into high pressures.

I don't load for the .300, but occasionally for the 7mmRemMag which is reasonably close in case capacity and bore diameter.
For the .300WM, I would probably stick with H4831, RL19, RL22, or something in that range. RL22 is a good performer for me in the 7mmRemMag.

JLA · 10-24-2012, 09:42 PM

Prolly be ok for reduced loads. But to answer the Q.. yes too fast.. Save it for the .223s and .308s stuff the big .300 with H4831SC.. One of my fav mag rifle powders.

langenc · 10-29-2012, 07:57 PM

I believe the new RELODER 17 was made for magnums, esp short fat ones.

We use RL 19 in my sons 300 WSM w/ very good results. At the time we started loading for it, RL 17 was not even born yet.

myfriendis410 · 10-29-2012, 11:17 PM

Yeah; but in the win mag RL19 and RL22 are both right in the sweet spot. H4831, IMR7828 etc. No way would I look at loading H335 for that cartridge.

Bindernut · 10-30-2012, 06:13 AM

To my mind (I prefer loads with slow-burning powders with as near to 100% density), RL-17 is a bit fast for the large-case magnums. I prefer the RL-19 & H4831 range too.

RL-17 is in the "4350" range on the burn chart. Alliant has never had a powder similar to IMR or Hodgdon 4350, RL-17 finally fills that gap. I haven't tried it yet, but it is on my options list for a few smaller cartridges.

If you prefer a faster burn rate, then RL-17 or any of the 4350s will work for the .300WinMag.

The Count · 11-01-2012, 07:02 PM

Thanks for the tips. I also came across a load table from IMR for their Trail Boss powder for rifles. They even have loads for the 300WM. I whipped up a dozen rounds with 20 grains of TB under a 150 gr. Hornady spire. Talk about a mild load! Sounds like a 223 out of a suppressed rifle. Lots of fun for target shooting. Saves your barrel from a premature death also. Decent accuracy, around 1 MOA at 100.

10-24-2012, 05:03 PM	#1
The Count V.I.P. Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 264	Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? I use H335 with pretty good success (less than 1/2 MOA at 100Y) in my .223 and 308. Just bought myself a Rem 700 stainless in 300 WM. Can't find any loads using this powder. Is it just way to fast for the larger cartridges? -->

10-24-2012, 09:10 PM	#2
Bindernut Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: ND, USA Posts: 2,447	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? H335 is pretty fast burning for a large-case like the .300WinMag. It's pretty identical in performance to Reloder15 and IMR3031...too fast a burner to get peak velocity before you start running into high pressures. I don't load for the .300, but occasionally for the 7mmRemMag which is reasonably close in case capacity and bore diameter. For the .300WM, I would probably stick with H4831, RL19, RL22, or something in that range. RL22 is a good performer for me in the 7mmRemMag.

10-24-2012, 09:42 PM	#3
JLA TFF Moderator/Host Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Heart Of Texas Contributor Posts: 17,315	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? Prolly be ok for reduced loads. But to answer the Q.. yes too fast.. Save it for the .223s and .308s stuff the big .300 with H4831SC.. One of my fav mag rifle powders. __________________ It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!

10-29-2012, 07:57 PM	#4
langenc V.I.P. Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Montmorency Co, MI Posts: 407	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? I believe the new RELODER 17 was made for magnums, esp short fat ones. We use RL 19 in my sons 300 WSM w/ very good results. At the time we started loading for it, RL 17 was not even born yet.

10-29-2012, 11:17 PM	#5
myfriendis410 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Lompoc California Posts: 542	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? Yeah; but in the win mag RL19 and RL22 are both right in the sweet spot. H4831, IMR7828 etc. No way would I look at loading H335 for that cartridge. __________________ Life's too short to shoot an ugly gun.....

10-30-2012, 06:13 AM	#6
Bindernut Advanced Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: ND, USA Posts: 2,447	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? To my mind (I prefer loads with slow-burning powders with as near to 100% density), RL-17 is a bit fast for the large-case magnums. I prefer the RL-19 & H4831 range too. RL-17 is in the "4350" range on the burn chart. Alliant has never had a powder similar to IMR or Hodgdon 4350, RL-17 finally fills that gap. I haven't tried it yet, but it is on my options list for a few smaller cartridges. If you prefer a faster burn rate, then RL-17 or any of the 4350s will work for the .300WinMag.

11-01-2012, 07:02 PM	#7
The Count V.I.P. Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 264	Re: Is H335 too fast for 300 WIN MAG? Thanks for the tips. I also came across a load table from IMR for their Trail Boss powder for rifles. They even have loads for the 300WM. I whipped up a dozen rounds with 20 grains of TB under a 150 gr. Hornady spire. Talk about a mild load! Sounds like a 223 out of a suppressed rifle. Lots of fun for target shooting. Saves your barrel from a premature death also. Decent accuracy, around 1 MOA at 100. Last edited by The Count; 11-01-2012 at 07:03 PM..