|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 635
|
Local gun store having a deal this weekend on New Frontier AR15 complete lowers with polymer receiver for $95.
Pro's: Lightweight @ 1.6 lbs. $100. Con's: It's plastic. ![]()
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 72
|
I just placed an order for one... Will have it next week. I hear a lot of good things about them... Btw- glocks and many other reliable weapons are made of high quality polymer. Why not an ar lower?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moore, Idaho
contributor
Posts: 2,618
|
An AR Lower of polymer can be extremely good quality with strength. However, I would not expect it to keep that strength during a 50 year period whether it's fired or not. A glass reinforced polymer will quite likely be good for about 50 years or more.
Carbon fiber base polymers - well, plan on your lifetime and your grandchildren's lifetime. So, the only questions are: 1) how long do you plan on having the carbine 'in service' and reliable? 2) How many test rounds and practice rounds will you expect to place through it 3) how much are you willing to have it weigh, and lastly, 4) how much money are you willing to spend on it with ammo? The military uses a combination of these questions and the reality is that AR's in the military are pretty much destroyed after two-five years of service and some are sold off (i.e. Fast and Furious). For the military - weight is everything. High quality, glass reinforced polymers are the only way to go for light weight. Best long term combination is the best polymers for the light duty areas and quality steel for the working parts. With a really nice lower, you can mate any upper and your barrel and feed in the upper need to be of very high quality steel. Last edited by WHSmithIV; 11-22-2012 at 02:59 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
no
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: nc mountains
Posts: 293
|
never Just not enough pro's to invest in one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW PA
Posts: 1,161
|
NO!
You can't take a part designed to made of aluminum and make it from plastic and expect it to work well. It would need to be about 40 percent thicker and beefed up even more in high stress areas which they are not. A Glock works because it was designed for the materials used. You could not make a 1911 frame and slide from plastic and expect it to work and hold up the same as steel (or aluminum), same with the AR receiver. And for what? To save a few ounces and a few dollars? If you are that hard up to save maybe AR's aren't really for you.
__________________
. “There will be a revolution in this country!” “I don’t believe people should to be able to own guns.” ~Barack Obama "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here." ~Captain John Parker, to his Minute Men on Lexington Green, April 19, 1775. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
Beautiful reply GH. I agree totally!
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 329
|
I think the question shoudl have been asked who has personal EXPERIENCE with polymer lowers and there quality.
I know a few folks who own them. The one that I will note here is a 07/02 friend who converted a bushmaster to FA 8 or more years ago and uses it for demos. He has fired countless thousands of rounds and it is still fine. What most people fail to understand is the LOWER does not take much in the way of stress or wear. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeast Georgia
Contributor
Posts: 6,334
|
YES,
I bought a New Frontier lower about three weeks ago to put on an AR57 upper that I traded for. I have only fired about 200 rounds since I bought it so I cant really say how it will hold up. You can't really tell it is plastic with a quick look but when you pick it up and feel the weight, it is obvious. With me putting it on the 5.7, I figured that it would not take a beating. I might change it out with a couple of AR's. every now and then. to test how it functions with a little more powerful caliber. I know a lot of people talk bad about plastic and I have for years, but I am happy with the performance, as of right now, anyway. It still will now make be buy a Glock, though.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member GeorgiaCarry.Org Member Retired US Army Postal Worker Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW. Florida
Posts: 1,219
|
Of course the lower only receives and retains the magazine, receives and retains the buttstock/grip & buffer and receives & retains the trigger/safety & fire control parts. None of those items listed are high stress items requiring high strength steel or aluminum to perform their functions. If the polymer lowers are made of a similar material as say glock pistols, I see no reason to poo-poo the idea.
A typical stripped AR lower made of cast aluminum: (Costs approx. $100 - $130) A typical AR lower with all the parts installed. Completely outfitted as shown with good metal parts the typical cost would be around $250. The complete polymer lowers at $100 seem almost too good to be true, and you know what they say about that.
__________________
Fear is a reaction..........Courage is a decision Last edited by Snakedriver; 11-22-2012 at 10:30 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW PA
Posts: 1,161
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
. “There will be a revolution in this country!” “I don’t believe people should to be able to own guns.” ~Barack Obama "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here." ~Captain John Parker, to his Minute Men on Lexington Green, April 19, 1775. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 635
|
Thanks everyone for the input. I had no desire for getting an AR15 because of the $, but when I saw this ad, I figured I could start with the lower, and slowly build it up. Also, the shop is having DROS for free.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,113
|
A big resounding NO from me.
What GunHugger said....
__________________
"Loud noises don't end gunfights.... well placed shots do."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Gilbert, SC
Posts: 306
|
nope... I am a metal kind of guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeast Georgia
Contributor
Posts: 6,334
|
No matter what caused those broken receivers, they are made of metal, which is supposedly so much stronger than polymer!!
__________________
NRA Endowment Member GeorgiaCarry.Org Member Retired US Army Postal Worker Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,315
|
Actually george, im fairly sure those pics GH posted are of poly lowers.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Contributor
Posts: 1,931
|
NEVER!!!!!
Those don't look like a forged lower to me.....
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- The only thing better than good family is good friends. J and D Lloyd Get ready...it's getting "real" and really fast!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 4,788
|
Yes, I would. Probably should word it "will," because my next lower will be polymer.
The lower receiver was originally made of aluminum because it takes almost no stress. That role can be done successfully with a variety of plastics. The high stress parts have always been made of steel, and they still are. Assuming that all polymers are the same is as silly as assuming that all metals are the same. Brass, iron, zinc, steel, aluminum, titanium, and probably many other metals have been used in firearms over the years. They are all different, but they are all acceptable for their own particular roles (though zinc perhaps should never have been used for anything). There was a time when steel was the new material and people weren't sure it would hold up.
__________________
Nothing posted on TheFirearmsForum.com constitutes legal, accounting, gunsmithing, or other professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals for real advice. Your life is lived at your own risk. Don't blame me for the dumb things you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Contributor
Posts: 790
|
I tried one and will not make the same mistake twice!
__________________
Fear is only a word in the mind of the weak! |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stafford, VA
Contributor
Posts: 3,071
|
The only thing the lower does is hold parts.
trigger group Pistol Grip Stock buffer Where is the stress in this equation? Nowhere, The lower has little anything to do with accuracy or strength. It is basically a parts box. So if I got a good enough deal on one sure I would buy it. But, from that add I would be buying that that M1 Carbine in 22lr. Those are SWEET. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,447
|
I'll stick with aluminum.
Quote:
I've seen one Carbon-15 in 5.56 that failed in the same manner. Not sure what use or prior abuse caused the failure...someone at the local range all of a sudden had a floppy AR in his hands. Seeing that really soured me on the whole carbon-polymer AR thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ND, USA
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
The first pic that gunhugger posted shows perfectly where the weak spot is on a plastic lower (regardless of what synthetic it's made from). Was that crack caused by the bolt/carrier pounding back against the buffer? Was it caused by someone tripping on the rifle and putting too much strain on the lower? I don't know...and I don't want my rifle to do that. Last edited by Bindernut; 11-22-2012 at 09:26 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: N. Ridgeville, Ohio
Posts: 292
|
My feeling on the plastic lowers are that they are a cheap way to get an AR that you will be able to replace in the future with a metal lower. Plan on it. If this is all you can afford at the time, go for it. Just plan to replace the lower in the future. The other issue is that some of these poly lowers, most likely this complete one, has all poly parts in it, not just the poly lower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Northeast Georgia
Contributor
Posts: 6,334
|
I figured that I would never know how one holds up until I tried it myself so I bought one to try out. In a few years, or a few weeks, I will know if it is still holding up, or not.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member GeorgiaCarry.Org Member Retired US Army Postal Worker Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|