The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearms > NFA Firearms & Related Items

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2004, 09:41 PM   #1
kurtzbm
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3
Default Post '86 Loophole?

From what I understand, only law enforcement can purchase post '86 full-auto weapons.

Does this mean that if you get yourself deputized and work part-time at the local sherrif dept. you can purchase newer weapons?

-->
kurtzbm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2004, 10:05 PM   #2
LIKTOSHOOT
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,367
Default

Yes, with a letter from the CLEO. But who will pay??? Not exactly a needed item in many LEO offices. AND it is theirs.....not yours. By the way.....it`s a loophole about like the gunshow loophole.




LTS
LIKTOSHOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2004, 07:16 AM   #3
CountryGunsmith
Advanced Senior Member
 
CountryGunsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Deep Piney Woods of East Texas
Posts: 5,116
Default

Exactly right.

The firearm MUST be transferred to the AGENCY, not the individual officer. Upon leaving employment with that agency, the firearm is either retained by the agency, transferred to another agency or transferred to a licensed SOT/dealer who can only transfer to another agency.

The kicker is that the post-'86 guns are MUCH less expensive, because of this.
__________________
The autonomic nervous system provides for involuntary muscle function - the work of breathing, digestion, and so forth. On some folks, that's a pure waste of ingenuity.
CountryGunsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2004, 04:31 PM   #4
45Smashemflat
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,494
Default

Its a great lesson in supply and demand. The supply of individually transferrable Class III guns is fixed. Dealer Samples/LEO units are not. Go to ImpactGuns.com and look at the basic M16 and the diff in price between the transferrable units and the Dealer Samples - OUCH. What a bummer....

Although - that makes transferrable Class II weapons a decent investment - interest is certainly there!!
45Smashemflat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2004, 06:21 PM   #5
kurtzbm
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3
Default How do security teams get them?

How do personal security companies get them?

Newer weapons have a greater appeal to me.


It would be real nice to be able to get a new H&K XM8 when they come out. I would like to try out a .223 weapon that has little to no recoil on full auto.

I was thinking that if I could establish a "personal security company" that would own the weapons, the corporation could own the weapons.

In the end, I guess I could plan a decade out to open a gun shop and become a dealer.

You can fire the weapons if you're a dealer, right?
kurtzbm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 01:26 PM   #6
stash247
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,815
Default

Under the law, the only "persona security companies" eligable to purchase post '86 class III weapons, are companies like the FBI, CIA, DEA, ATF, etc. If it's not governmental, it's not eligable.
Now, such a civilian company could legally buy pre-86, resistered firearms, but "Deep Pockets" would likely be required.
Yes, as a Special Occupational Taxpayer, you can shoot your 'dealer samples', but, no, they will never be yours, as personal property, because they are only transferable to a police or other government agency. And, there is a small matter of the annual tax, and license fee, to consider.
__________________
Don't start no s**t and there won't be none, Terry
stash247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2004, 03:01 PM   #7
SOT_II
V.I.P. Member
 
SOT_II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Berkshires
Posts: 80
Default Re: Post '86 Loophole?

ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Only Departments, Agencies or Organizations that are legitimate law enforcment or Military can. Individual officers MAY NOT personally own a post sample MG.

The only other allowence is FFL's with a SOT. They can buy and sell post samples. )7/C2's like me can buy, sell, and make post samples.

In the instances of buying and selling you need a CLEO letter for buying and if selling to another dealer. For making, an 07/C2 can build them without a letter.
SOT_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2004, 03:06 PM   #8
SOT_II
V.I.P. Member
 
SOT_II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Berkshires
Posts: 80
Default Re: Post '86 Loophole?

This is not entirely true...there are TWO types of dealer samples. Pre May dealer samples, that can be owned by SOT while a dealer or MFG...and can be kept after they quit being an FFL/SOT....

Post samples can only be owned by a dealer (SOT) while a dealer (SOT)...when done they have to be sold or destroyed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by stash247
Under the law, the only "persona security companies" eligable to purchase post '86 class III weapons, are companies like the FBI, CIA, DEA, ATF, etc. If it's not governmental, it's not eligable.
Now, such a civilian company could legally buy pre-86, resistered firearms, but "Deep Pockets" would likely be required.
Yes, as a Special Occupational Taxpayer, you can shoot your 'dealer samples', but, no, they will never be yours, as personal property, because they are only transferable to a police or other government agency. And, there is a small matter of the annual tax, and license fee, to consider.
SOT_II is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com