|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#26 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deep South Mississippi
Posts: 5,943
|
I know it ain't got much to do with the post but my defense shot's usually consist of a three shot pattern staring at waist moving to center mass and then the head, but that is only if I and the police percive it as a life or death situation.
__________________
Only you can see this
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Posts: 10,344
|
Navyvet, I thought you might have been speaking figuratively. However, I'm anal enough to step in there anyway, doncha know?
Actually, whenever I see that type of statement on these forums, I like to put the appropriate disclaimer in. There are many browsing these boards who don't have our experience and training, so I try to dispell any Hollywood myths I can, any chance I get. Have you ever seen just how it is they get that .22 pistol to blow the guy through the picture window? Great fun. For everybody but the stuntman. ![]() Pops |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville Tn.
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,636
|
My wife, Stephannie, always practices head shots. She's not bad, either. She doesn't believe in "center of mass" shots. Her philosophy is that putting one in his face at the very least makes it harder for him to see her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 13,094
|
Quote:
There's always been a lot of argument over whether a head shot is tactically a good choice, but generally, I think I agree with your wife, at least under some circumstances. Obviously, a head shot is more difficult to make accurately every time since heads tend to move far more radically and far more often than a target's center-of-mass. The only rounds that truly count in a gunfight, after all, are the ones that hit the target. On the other hand, the average "Joe Sixpack" thinks a handgun round--any handgun round--acts similarly to an RPG or artillery shell hit to the body: one good hit and the danger's over! Television and the movies tend to exacerbate that idiotic view. As any knowledgable shooter knows well, even the more powerful handgun rounds like the .44 Mag and .45 ACP or LC are mere wimps when compared to a rifle or shotgun round. Essentially, handguns are useful only because they are relatively light, easy to carry and conceal, and because--fortunately or unfortunately--a human being is not a terribly difficult animal to incapacitate or kill. A good hit to the center-of-mass with any reasonable caliber handgun will probably kill . . . eventually. That's little comfort, however, if before the target dies he manages to get to you.In the final analysis, I think it comes down to a (very fast!) judgment call after due consideration had been given to the particular circumstances one faces at the time. For myself, I know I would be far more likely to go for the more uncertain head shot if the attacker appeared to be hopped up on drugs or I had the suspicion he was wearing any sort of body armor.
__________________
--Pistolenschutze (Pistol Shooter) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
*TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At SouthernMoss' side forever!
Contributor
Posts: 13,854
|
I agree with pistol. Under most close up circumstances, the head shot will get the job done. I have always been concerned about body protection since it has become readily available.
__________________
![]() ![]() The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. The only criminal class native to the United States is Congress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,636
|
Just a small point, Pistol: Notice how I spelled her name. It really DOES have two "N"s in it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 13,094
|
Quote:
Marlin, you are quite correct. Body armor has become pretty effective and very unobtrusive in recent years, unlike those useless POS flak jackets they issued us in Vietnam. I used to sit on mine when we rode in the slicks in the hope it might save something important someday! Fortunately, I never had occasion to find out for sure, but to this day, I seriously doubt it. I've seen AK rounds go through them like the proverbial hot knife through butter. Anyway, those new Kevlar jackets are pretty good at stopping at least common handgun rounds. That's a good thing for our police officers, but alas, the bad guys have taken to wearing them too.
__________________
--Pistolenschutze (Pistol Shooter) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|