|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vernon, TX
Posts: 134
|
Which of the Russian manufacturing plants had the better quality firearms? Is there any difference in the two? I have heard that the Tula firearms are more desirable and were produced in smaller quantities. I have a Tula M1895 and my 91/30 is an Izhevsk.
__________________
"Politicians hide themselves away. They only started the war. Why should they go out to fight? They leave that role to the poor, yeah." --Black Sabbath, War Pigs "Yes as a matter of fact, I am a Christian, American, Heterosexual, PRO-GUN, Conservative." "Any questions?"
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,138
|
The quality was about the same. However, some Russian firearms from certain factories will command a slightly higher price due to production figures there. It just depends on the model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vernon, TX
Posts: 134
|
The only thing that I've noticed is that the stampings on the Tula rifles (91/30's) are a little bit better than the ones on the Izhevsk rifles.
__________________
"Politicians hide themselves away. They only started the war. Why should they go out to fight? They leave that role to the poor, yeah." --Black Sabbath, War Pigs "Yes as a matter of fact, I am a Christian, American, Heterosexual, PRO-GUN, Conservative." "Any questions?" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|