VP Debate

[njretcop]

The moderator for Thursday night's VP debate is shown here with her idol.

She wrote a book about him and it should hit book stores soon. She alone picked the questions to be asked at the debate!

Palin would have to be nuts to even show up!! What kinda fair debate can it be????

[USMC-03]

Palin could use this to her advantage if played right. The first words out of her mouth need to be directed to Ifill:

"Congratulations on your book Gwen. It's wonderful to see a member of the left wing press actually stop pretending to be impartial and admit where their loyalties actually lie. It's very refreshing. Do you think you could get me a copy signed by both you and Barak?"

[358 winchester]

Originally Posted by USMC-03

Palin could use this to her advantage if played right. The first words out of her mouth need to be directed to Ifill:

"Congratulations on your book Gwen. It's wonderful to see a member of the left wing press actually stop pretending to be impartial and admit where their loyalties actually lie. It's very refreshing. Do you think you could get me a copy signed by both you and Barak?"

I would fall out of my chair laughing that is for sure

[Vladimir]

We won't know until tomorrow night. Some people can actually do a good job at being neutral, they are far and few between. But only time will tell.

I of course won't see it because I have class . But it's Russian, and since Russia will likely be a strong part of the debates I'm going to try and get the professor to let us out half an hour early!

[Marlin T]

Does that mean you are going to be voting for the communist Biden?

[armedandsafe]

Does that mean you are going to be voting for the communist Biden?

Let me see if I understand this correctly:
He has a class in the Russioan language.
He thinks our relations with Russia will be a part of the debate.
He is going to ask the instructor for early release from class.

Ergo: he is voting communist?

Hmmmm

Pops

[artabr]

What!?
Bill Ayers wasn't available as a debate moderator???

I hope that Gov. Palin does confront Ifill about the book.
Ifill didn't inform the debate committee about her book. I have heard that this took place in August, surely Ifill knew about her own book. It looks kinda deceitful to me.

Gov. Palin needs to call her out on it right out of the box. Something nice like.
Great Obama book, you skank. (sorry my thoughts getting the better of me. )
I guess maybe something such as.
Congratulations on the new Obama book, Gwen. When is it due out. Zing


Art

My apologies to the original poster of this image. It just seems so "right". Duh, never mind, it was me that posted it. Too many gears turning and they are all stuck in neutral.

[dcd_enterprises]

I'm not worried about this debate at all. Actually, I'm looking forward to it, and is not often that one looks forward to a vice-presidential debate. Actually, I liked the last one, a political-lightweight, John Edwards going up against the well seasoned Dick Cheney. They were good.

Anyway, as I said, I'm not worried, if nothing else, Governor Palin will have Joe Biden there to help her defeat Joe Biden, and I don't think she could possibly have more help.

[gdmoody]

I agree with you dcd, Mr. Biden can't seem to keep both of his feet out of his mouth long enough to speak intelligently. I have to work but thank goodness for DVR.

[satellite66]

Originally Posted by USMC-03

Palin could use this to her advantage if played right. The first words out of her mouth need to be directed to Ifill:

"Congratulations on your book Gwen. It's wonderful to see a member of the left wing press actually stop pretending to be impartial and admit where their loyalties actually lie. It's very refreshing. Do you think you could get me a copy signed by both you and Barak?"

That would be priceless. I wonder if Gwen would lose it if she said that?

[dcd_enterprises]

Ms. Coulter's thoughts on Mr. Biden.

Biden Secret Service Code Name: 'Assassination Insurance'
by Ann Coulter
10/01/2008

While Gov. Sarah Palin is being grilled on her position on mark-to-market accounting rules, the press can't bother to ask Joe Biden if he could give us a ballpark estimate on when Franklin D. Roosevelt was president -- or maybe take a stab at guessing the decade when televisions were first available to the public.

Being interviewed by Katie Couric on the "CBS Evening News," Biden said: "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"

For those of you who aren't hard-core history buffs, Biden not only named the wrong president during the 1929 stock market crash, he also claimed a president who wasn't president during the stock market crash went on TV before Americans had TVs.

Other than that, the statement holds up pretty well. At least Biden managed to avoid mentioning any "clean" Negroes he had met.

Couric was nearly moved to tears by the brilliance of Biden's brain-damaged remark. She was especially intrigued by Biden's claim that FDR had said the new iPhone was the bomb!

Here is Couric's full response to Biden's bizarre outburst about FDR (a) being president and (b) going on TV in 1929: "Relating to the fears of the average American is one of Biden's strong suits."

But when our beauteous Sarah said that John McCain was a better leader on the economy than Barack Obama, Couric relentlessly badgered her for evidence. "Why do you say that?" Couric demanded. "Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama? ... Can you give us any more examples of his leading the charge for more oversight?"

The beauteous Sarah had cited McCain's prescient warnings about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But Couric, the crackerjack journalist who didn't know FDR wasn't president in 1929, demanded more examples from Palin.

We are currently in the middle of a massive financial crisis brought on by Fannie Mae. McCain was right on Fannie Mae; Obama was wrong. That's not enough?

Not for the affable Eva Braun of evening TV! "I'm just going to ask you one more time," Couric snipped, "not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?"

This would be like responding to someone who predicted the 9/11 attacks by saying: OK, you got one thing right. Not to belabor the point, but what else?

Obama was not merely wrong on Fannie Mae: He is owned by Fannie Mae. Somehow Obama managed to become the second biggest all-time recipient of Fannie Mae political money after only three years in the Senate. The biggest beneficiary, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd, had a 30-year head start on receiving loot from Fannie Mae -- the government-backed institution behind our current crisis.

How does the Democratic ticket stack up on other major issues facing the nation, say, gas prices?

Shockingly, Sen. Joe Biden was one of only five senators to vote against the first Alaskan pipeline bill in 1973. This is like having been a Nazi sympathizer during World War II. If Sarah Palin does nothing else, she has got to tie that idiotic pipeline vote around Biden's neck.

The Senate passed the 1973 Alaskan pipeline bill by an overwhelming 80-5 vote. Only five senators voted against the pipeline on final passage. Sen. Biden is the only one who is still in the Senate -- the other four having been confined to mental institutions long ago.

The stakes were clear: This was in the midst of the first Arab oil embargo. Liberal Democrats, such as senators Robert Byrd, Mike Mansfield, Frank Church and Hubert Humphrey, all voted for the pipeline.

But Biden cast one of only five votes against the pipeline that has produced more than 15 billion barrels of oil, supplied nearly 20 percent of this nation's oil, created tens of thousands of jobs, added hundreds of billions of dollars to the U.S. economy and reduced money transfers to the nation's enemies by about the same amount.

The only argument against the pipeline was that it would harm the caribou, an argument that was both trivial and wrong. The caribou population near the pipeline increased from 5,000 in the 1970s to 32,000 by 2002.

It would have been bad enough to vote against the pipeline bill even if it had hurt the caribou. A sane person would still say: Our enemies have us in a vice grip. Sorry, caribou, you've got to take one for the team. But when the pipeline goes through and the caribou population sextuples in the next 20 years, you really look like a moron.

We couldn't possibly expect Couric to ask Biden about a vote that is the equivalent of voting against the invention of the wheel. But couldn't she have come up with just one follow-up question for Biden on FDR's magnificent handling of the 1929 stock market crash?

Or here's a question the public is dying to know: "If Obama wanted a historically delusional vice president, why not Lyndon LaRouche?" At least LaRouche didn't vote against the Alaskan pipeline.

[LDBennett]

It was explained by Dick Morris on Fox's Bill O'Riley show that she has a possibility of perhaps $350,000 or more reward for this book if Obama wins and nearly zero if he looses. The release date is timed for right after the election and if Obama wins it is almost guaranteed to be a best seller and if he looses then a dud. A best seller is 100,000 books and the writers share is about $3.50 a book according to Morris, a published and best seller author (as is Bill O'Riley who offered no comments in suport of or in objection to Morris allegation).

If that were my options I sure would try to make Palin look uninformed and Biden great to assure my future. Loosing $350,000 or more could be detrimental to your future spending plans!

LDBennett

[mrkirker]

My thoughts are that a moderator might be tempted to try to control the debate, however, once the participants begin speaking, things are pretty well out of the moderator's control.

Let's hope that the young lady from Alaska has her A-game with her tonight. A poor performance on her part will negate any 'plus' that adding her to the ticket might have produced.

It will be interesting to see her in an un-scripted setting. Other than a few speaches during the initial 'Palin Love-Fest', I've not heard that much from her. Of course, the same goes for Biden. Several of us who shoot at the local range are meeting in a friends den that has one of those big assed TV's on the wall. Pop-corn and beer, anyone?

Seriously, Ms. Palin carries a special weight for the party, as she is the running mate of a 72-year-old with recurrent melanoma!

[Vladimir]

Palin probably won't bring it up. They will keep it in the reserves in case Palin does poorly at the debates, then they will make it issue #1 to defend that "there was no way she could have done good when the moderator clearly was biased..."

Which is the smart move.